--- en Français ci-dessous ---
This new episode of the Research at the Albert Hirschman Centre on Democracy (RAHCD) podcast continues the conversation on civic technologies for a second part to our miniseries on civic tech and democratic participation. Jerôme Duberry, Associate Researcher at the Albert Hirschman Centre on Democracy, has been focusing his research on digital technologies and collaborative governance for many years. In this episode (in French), Jerôme continues his conversation with Christopher Larraz, technologies and innovation advisor for the state of Geneva.
The recent rise in civic activism and public engagement in various countries has been tied with the digital age, and social media in particular. Activists have taken advantage of these technologies to foster engagement and social impact. These technologies have also gradually been used by governmental institutions, in particular at the local level. In Geneva, the public sector has embraced them as a tool for citizen participation and empowerment. Can these innovations empower voters and lead to a more open governance? Are they in danger of discriminating against certain local communities if transparency is lacking? These questions serve as a thread to the conversation between Jérôme Duberry and Chrstopher Larraz.
They argue that civic technologies may enable new channels of consultation, exchange, communication, and information, strengthen partnerships for a truly participatory government. Yet they require an open data approach from public officials and government agencies if they are to enlist the population in this digital transformation. This data-driven civic participation also calls for some form of risk management and oversight. Public engagement requires fostering trust from voters.
Stay tuned for future parts of this series concerning the real world experiences with civic-tech, and how other countries have adopted the practices.
And subscribe to the podcast to receive all the latest conversations on research at the Albert Hirschman Centre on Democracy.