|
|
Sécurité Européenne (E299)
Vendredi, 16:15-18:00, S1
Chargée d'enseignement:
Dr. Thierry Tardy
Email: t.tardy@gcsp.ch
Assistant for Course Logistics:
Jonas Hagmann
Email: hagmann9@hei.unige.ch
Objectifs
Le Séminaire vise à étudier l’environnement européen de sécurité dans la période post-Guerre froide. L’objectif général est d’offrir un cadre contextuel et conceptuel au thème de la sécurité européenne par une approche de science politique combinant analyse théorique et études de cas.
L’objectif général est servi par l’analyse des éléments suivants :
- concepts de sécurité (sécurité et défense collective, communauté de sécurité, sécurité régionale, culture stratégique, sécurité humaine, théorie des alliances, etc.) ;
- théorie des relations internationales et sécurité européenne ;
- principaux développements liés à la sécurité européenne ;
- politiques publiques des Etats européens en matière de sécurité ;
- mécanismes institutionnels et processus de décision des institutions européennes de sécurité (Union européenne et OTAN) ;
- élaboration de la Politique étrangère et de sécurité commune (PESC) et de la Politique européenne de sécurité et de défense (PESD) de l’Union européenne ;
- adaptation des acteurs de la sécurité face à l’évolution des menaces ;
- relations transatlantiques ;
- nature de l’architecture européenne de sécurité et relations inter-institutionnelles ;
- relation entre sécurité interne et sécurité externe.
Méthode Pédagogique – Structure des Séances
Le séminaire compte 13 séances. Chaque séance (à l’exception de la séance d’introduction) se structure de la façon suivante:
- un ou deux exposés (en fonction du nombre d’étudiants) fait(s) par les étudiants ;
- débat avec le reste du groupe ;
- reprise et conclusion par le chargé d’enseignement.
Les exposés et débats intègrent les concepts exposés dans les lectures et séances précédentes et favorisent l’analyse et la mise en perspective au détriment du descriptif.
Lectures
Tous les articles à lire en préparation des séances sont mis à disposition.
Evaluation
L’évaluation se fait selon les modalités suivantes :
- participation orale : 30%
- exposé écrit et oral : 70%
Plan des Séances
I - INTRODUCTION A LA SÉCURITÉ EUROPÉENNE
Mars 16, 2007, Vendredi (16h15-18h)
Séance 1 – Présentation du séminaire : objectifs, méthodologie, évaluation, bibliographie
Mars 23, 2007, Vendredi (16h15-18h)
Séance 2 – Sécurité, Acteurs, Menaces: Introduction conceptuelle
Thèmes d’exposé:
| 1. |
Evolution et analyse critique des sujets de la sécurité. |
| 2. |
Dans quelle mesure l’Europe est-elle un sujet/objet de la sécurité ? |
Lectures obligatoires:
- WALT Stephen, “The Renaissance of Security Studies”, International Studies Quarterly, vol.35, 1991, pp.211-239.
- BALDWIN David, “Security Studies and the End of the Cold War”, World Politics, vol.48, n°1, Oct. 1995, pp.117-141
- KRAUSE Keith and WILLIAMS Michael, “From Strategy to Security: Foundations of Critical Security Studies”, in KRAUSE and WILLIAMS (eds.), Critical Security Studies, Minneapolis, Borderlines, 1997.
Lectures optionnelles:
- BADIE Bertrand et Marie-Claude SMOUTS, “La dialectique de l’intégration / exclusion”, in Badie et Smouts, Le retournement du monde. Sociologie de la scène internationale, Paris, Presses de Science Po, 3è édition, 1999, pp.179-203.
- BIGO Didier, “Nouveaux regards sur les conflits ?”, in Smouts (dir.), Les nouvelles relations internationales. Pratiques et théories, Paris, Presses de Science Po, 1998.
- BUZAN Barry, People, States and Fear : An Agenda for International Security Studies in the Post-Cold War Era, 2nd edition, Boulder, Lynne Rienner, 1991.
- BUZAN Barry and Ole WAEVER, Regions and Powers. The Structure of International Security, Cambridge, Cambridge University Press, 2003, 564 p.
- BUZAN Barry, WAEVER Ole and Jaap de WILDE, Security. A New Framework for Analysis, Boulder, Lynne Rienner, 1998.
- CROFT Stuart and TERRIF Terry (eds.), Critical Reflections on Security and Change, London, Frank Cass, 2000.
- DAVID Charles-Philippe, “Stratégie et sécurité à l’aube du XXIè siècle”, in David, La Guerre et la paix. Approches contemporaines de la sécurité et de la stratégie, Paris, Presses de Sciences Po, 2000, pp. 21-52.
- DAVID Dominique, “Violence internationale : une scénographie nouvelle”, Ramsès, IFRI, Paris, 2000.
- HOLSTI Kalevi, The State, War, and the State of War, Cambridge, Cambridge University Press, 1996.
- KALDOR Mary, New and Old Wars. Organised Violence in a Global Era, Stanford, Stanford University Press, 2001.
- KALDOR Mary, “Old Wars, Cold Wars, New Wars, and the War on Terror”, International Politics, vol.42, 2005, pp.491-498.
- KEOHANE Robert and Joseph NYE, Power and Interdependence, New York, Longman, 3rd edition, 2001.
- KEOHANE Robert and Lisa MARTIN, “The Promise of Institutionalist Theory”, International Security, vol.20, n°1, Summer 1995, pp.39-51.
- KRAUSE Keith and WILLIAMS Michael (eds.), Critical Security Studies, Minneapolis, Borderlines, 1997.
- LIPSCHUTZ Ronnie (ed.), On Security, New York, Columbia University Press, 1995.
- McSWEENEY Bill, “The Meaning of Security”, in McSWEENEY, Security, Identity and Interests : A Sociology of International Relations, Cambridge, Cambridge University Press, 1999.
- MEARSHEIMER John, “The False Promise of International Institutions”, International Security, vol.19, n°3, Winter 1994/95.
- PARIS Roland, “Human Security: Paradigm Shift or Hot Air?”, International Security, vol.26, Fall 2001.
- SALAME Ghassan, “Les guerres de l’après-guerre froide”, in Smouts (dir.), Les nouvelles relations internationales. Pratiques et théories, Paris, Presses de Science Po, 1998.
- SMITH Steve, “The Increasing Insecurity of Security Studies : Conceptualizing Security in the Last Twenty Years”, Contemporary Security Studies, vol.20, n°3, Dec. 1999, pp.72-101.
- STOET Peter, Human and Global Security: An Explanation of Terms, Toronto, University of Toronto Press, 1999.
- VAN CREVELD Martin, Les transformations de la guerre, éditions du Rocher, 1998.
- WALLENDER Celeste and Robert KEOHANE, “Risk, Threat and Security Institutions”, in Helga Heftebdorn, Robert O. Keohane, and Celeste A. Wallander (eds.), Imperfect Unions: Security Institutions over Time and Space, New York, Oxford University Press, 1999, pp.21-47.
- WAEVER Ole, “Securitization and Desecuritization”, in LIPSCHUTZ Ronnie (ed.), On Security, New York, Columbia University Press, 1995.
- WALKER R.B.J., “The Subject of Security”, in KRAUSE Keith and WILLIAMS Michael (eds.), Critical Security Studies, Minneapolis, Borderlines, 1997.
- United Nations Development Program, Human Development Report, 1994.
- Canada Department of Foreign Affairs and International Trade, Human Security: Safety for People in a Changing World, Ottawa, April 1999.
- The Barcelona Report of the Study Group on Europe’s Security Capabilities. “A Human Security Doctrine for Europe”, Barcelona, 15 September 2004.
- “The Future of Strategy and War”, special issue of Survival, n°4, hiver 1998-99.
- Human Security Centre, “Human Security Report, 2005. War and Peace in the 21st Century”, The University of British Columbia, Canada, 2005.
Mars 30, 2007, Vendredi (16h15-18h)
Séance 3 – L'Environnement Européen de Sécurité pendant la Guerre Froide: Dépendance Stratégique entre l'Europe et les Etats-Unis
Thèmes d’exposé:
| 1. |
Dans quelle mesure la guerre froide a-t-elle façonné l’approche européenne des questions de sécurité ? |
| 2. |
Analyse critique de l’architecture européenne de sécurité pendant la guerre froide. |
Lectures obligatoires:
- BOOTH Ken, “Cold Wars of the Mind”, in BOOTH (ed.), Statecraft and Security : the Cold War and Beyond, Cambridge, Cambridge University Press, 1998, pp. 29-55.
- GADDIS John Lewis, “Spheres of Influences : The United States and Europe, 1945-1949”, pp.48-71, in Gaddis, The Long Peace. Inquiries into the History of the Cold War, Oxford University Press, 1987.
- JOFFE Joseph, “Europe’s American Pacifier”, Foreign Policy, Spring 1984, pp. 64-82.
Lectures optionnelles:
- ARON Raymond, Paix et guerre entre les nations, Calmann-Lévy, 1962.
- ART Robert and Kenneth WALTZ (eds.), The Use of Force. Military Power and International Politics, 4th edition, University Press of America, 1993./li>
- BALL Margaret, NATO and the European Union Movement, Westport, Greenwood Press, 1974.
- BERTRAM Christoph, Europe in the Balance: Securing the Peace Won in the Cold War, Washington, DC, Carnegie Endowment for International Peace, 1995.
- BOOTH (ed.), Statecraft and Security : the Cold War and Beyond, Cambridge, Cambridge University Press, 1998.
- DAALDER Ivo, The Nature and Practice of Flexible Response: NATO Strategy and Theatre Nuclear Forces Since 1967, New York, Columbia University Press, 1991.
- DOBSON Alan (ed.), Deconstructing and Reconstructing the Cold War, Brookfield, Ashgate, 1999.
- FREEDMAN Lawrence, The Evolution of Nuclear Strategy, New York, St. Martin’s Press, 1983.
- GADDIS John Lewis, The Long Peace. Inquiries into the History of the Cold War, Oxford University Press, 1989, 352 p.
- HOLSTI Kaveli, Peace and War. Armed Conflicts and International Order, 1648-1989, Cambridge, Cambridge University Press, 1991.
- McGEORGE Bundy, Danger and Survival: Choices About the Bomb in the First Fifty Years, New York, Random House, 1988.
- RISTE Olav, Western Security: The Formative Years: European and Atlantic Defense 1947-1953, New York, Columbia University Press, 1985.
- SAGAN Scott and WALTZ Kenneth, The Spread of Nuclear Weapons : A Debate, WW Norton, 1995.
- WOHLSTETTER Albert, “The Delicate Balance of Terror”, Foreign Affairs, vol.37, n°2, January 1959.
II – LA FIN DE LA GUERRE FROIDE ET LES CONSÉQUENCES SUR LA SÉCURITÉ EN EUROPE
Avril 6, 2007, Vendredi (16h15-18h)
Séance 4 – L'Émergente Architecture Européenne de Sécutité
L'Union Européenne et la PESC, Sécurité Régionale et 'Communauté de Sécurité'
Thèmes d’exposé:
| 1. |
La PESC fait-elle de l’Union européenne une ‘communauté de sécurité’ ? |
| 2. |
L’Union européenne et la prévention des conflits |
Lectures obligatoires:
- ADLER Emmanuel and Michael BARNETT, “Security Communities in theoretical perspectives”, in Adler and Barnett, Security Communities, Cambridge, Cambridge University Press, 1998, pp.3-28.
- BAUN Michael, “The Maastricht Treaty as High Politics : Germany, France and European Integration”, Political Science Quarterly, Winter 1995/96, pp.605-624.
- SCHWOK René, Théories de l’intégration européenne, Paris, Montchrestien, coll. Clefs-Politique, 2005, pp.21-121.
Lectures optionnelles:
- BURGESS Peter, “The insecurity of the community of values: The European Union as a Security Community”, Hans Günter Brauch, John Grin, Czeslaw Mesjasz, Navnita Chadha Behera, Béchir Chourou, Ursula Oswald Spring, P. H. Liotta, Patricia Kameri-Mbote (eds.) Globalisation and Environmental Challenges: Reconceptualising Security in the 21st Century, Berlin, Springer-Verlag, 2006.
- ADLER Emmanuel and Michael BARNETT, Security Communities, Cambridge, Cambridge University Press, 1998, 462 p.
- DEUTSCH Karl et al., Political Community and the North Atlantic Area. International Organization in the Light of Historical Experience, New York, Greenwood Press, 1957.
- DWAN Renata, “Conflict Prevention”, in SIPRI Yearbook 2002, Oxford University Press, 2002.
- EVERTS Steven, Lawrence FREEDMAN, Charles GRANT, François HEISBOURG, Daniel KEOHANE and Michael O’HANLON, A European Way of War, London, Centre for European Reform, 2004.
- HAAS Ernst, The Uniting of Europe. Political, Social, and Economic Forces, 1950-1957, University of Notre Dame Press, 3rd edition, 2004.
- HYDE-PRICE Adrian, “‘Normative’ power Europe: a realist critique”, Journal of European Public Policy, 13:2, March 2006, 217–234.
- KRONENBERG Vincent and Jan WOUTERS (eds.), The EU and Conflict Prevention: Policy and Legal Aspects, The Hague, TMC Asser Press, 2004.
- LEQUESNE Christian et Yves SUREL (dir.), L’intégration européenne. Entre émergence institutionnelle et recomposition de l’Etat, Paris, Science Po Les Presses, 2004, 291 p.
- MITRANY David, A Working Peace System. An Argument for the Functional Development of International Organization, Londres, Royal Institute of International Affairs, 1943.
- MÖLLER Frank, “Capitalizing on Difference: A Security Community or/as a Western Project”, Security Dialogue, vol.34, n°3, September 2003, pp.315-28.
- MORAVCSIK Andrew, “The European Constitutional Compromise and the Neofunctionalist Legacy”, Journal of European Public Policy, vol.12, n°2, April 2005, pp.349-386.
Avril 20, 2007, Vendredi (16h15-18h)
Séance 5 – Défense Collective, Théorie des Alliances, Gestion de Crises : De la Pertinence de l'OTAN après la Guerre Friode
Thèmes d’exposé:
| 1. |
Pourquoi l’OTAN a-t-elle survécu à la fin de la Guerre froide ? |
| 2. |
Bilan de 15 ans de gestion des crises par l’OTAN |
Lectures obligatoires:
- GLASER Charles, “Why NATO is Still Best : Future Security Arrangements for Europe”, International Security, vol.18, n°1, Summer 1993, pp. 5-50.
- WALT Stephen, “The Ties that Fray : Why Europe and America are Drifting Apart”, The National Interest, Winter 1998/99, pp.3-11.
- TERTRAIS Bruno, “The Changing Nature of Military Alliances”, Washington Quarterly, Vol. 27, No. 2 (Spring 2004): pp. 135-149.
Lectures optionnelles:
- BARANY Zoltan, “NATO’s Post-Cold War Metamorphosis. From Sixteen to Twenty-six and counting”, International Studies Review, vol.8, n°1, March 2006, pp. 165-178.
- DAALDER Ivo and GOLDGEIER James, “Global NATO”, Foreign Affairs, vol.85, n°5, Sept./Oct. 2006.
- DUFFIELD John, “NATO’s Functions after the Cold War”, Political Science Quarterly, vol.109, n°5, Winter 1994/95, pp.763-787.
- GENTRY John, “Norms and Military Power: NATO’s War against Yugoslavia”, Security Studies, vol.15, n°2, April-June 2006.
- JOYCE Mark, “NATO’s Return to Politics”, The RUSI Journal, vol.150, n°3, June 2005, pp.10-14.
- KAY Sean, “What Went Wrong with NATO?”, Cambridge Review of International Affairs, vol.18, n°1, April 2005, pp.69-83.
- KAY Sean, “NATO, the Kosovo War, and Neoliberal Theory”, Contemporary Security Policy, vol.25, n°2, pp.252-279.
- LEPGOLD Joseph, “NATO’s Post-Cold War Collective Action Problem”, International Security, vol.23, n°1, Summer 1998, pp.78-106.
- McCALLA Robert, “NATO’s Persistence after the Cold War”, International Organization, vol.50, n°3, Summer 1996, pp.445-475.
- MEARSHEIMER John, “Back to the Future : Instability in Europe after the Cold War”, International Security, vol.15, n°1, Summer 1990, pp. 5-56.
- PRESS-BARNATHAN Galia, “Managing the Hegemon: NATO under Unipolarity”, Security Studies, vol.15, n° 2, April-June 2006.
- RATTI Luca, “Post-cold War NATO and International Relations Theory: The Case for Neo-Classical Realism”, Journal of Transatlantic Studies, vol. 4, n°1, 2006.
- RISSE-KAPPEN Thomas, “Collective Identity in a Democratic Community. The Case of NATO”, in KATZENSTEIN Peter (ed.), The Culture of National Security. Norms and Identities of World Politics, New York, Columbia University Press, 1996.
- SCHMIDT John, “Last Alliance Standing? NATO after 9/11”, The Washington Quarterly, vol. 30, n°1, Winter 2006/2007.
- TARDY Thierry, “La gestion des crises : un nouveau défi pour l’OTAN”, La Revue internationale et stratégique, n° 32, décembre 1998.
- VAN EVERA Stephen, “Primed for Peace : Europe after the Cold War”, International Security, Winter 1990/91, pp. 7-50.
- WALLENDER Celeste, “Institutional Assets and Adaptability: NATO after the Cold War”, International Organization, vol.54, n°4, Autumn 2000, pp.705-735.
- WALT Stephen, “The Precarious Partnership: America and Europe in a New Era”, in Charles Kupchan (ed.), Atlantic Security: Contending Visions, Council on Foreign Relations, 1998, pp.5-44.
- YOST David, “NATO and the Anticipatory Use of Force”, International Affairs, vol.39, n°1, 2007.
Avril 27, 2007, Vendredi (16h15-18h)
Séance 6 – Genèse et Gestion des Conflits Yougoslaves (1991-1999) : Limites Institutionnelles
Thèmes d’exposé:
| 1. |
En quoi les conflits yougoslaves sont-ils caractéristiques de l’évolution de l’environnement international post-guerre froide ? |
| 2. |
Leçons apprises de la gestion des conflits yougoslaves par les acteurs étatiques (Etats et organisations internationales). |
Lectures obligatoires:
- BUSH Kenneth and KEYMAN Fuat, “Identity-Based Conflict: Rethinking Security in a Post-Cold War World, Global Governance, n°3, 1997.
- GHEBALI Victor, “La cogestion du conflit yougoslave par les organisations internationales : beaucoup de bruit pour rien”, Le Trimestre du monde, 1993/4, n° 24, pp. 167-184.
- POSEN Barry, “The Security Dilemma and Ethnic Conflict”, Survival, Spring 1993.
Lectures optionnelles:
- BATT Judy (ed.), The Western Balkans: Moving On, Paris, EU Institute for Security Studies, Oct. 2004.
- BIEBER Florian and Zidas DASKALOVSKI, Understanding the War in Kosovo, London, Frank Cass, 2003.
- BOUGAREL Xavier, Bosnie. Anatomie d’un conflit, Paris, La Découverte, 1996.
- BROWN Michael, COTE Owen, LYNN-JONES Sean and Steven MILLER (eds.), Nationalism and Ethnic Conflict. An international Security Reader, Cambridge, MIT Press, 2001, 491 p.
- CLARK Wesley, Waging Modern War. Bosnia, Kosovo, and the Future of Combat, New York, PublicAffairs, 2001.
- GELLNER Ernest, “Nations and Nationalism”, in BETTS Richard, Conflict after the Cold War. Arguments on Causes of War and Peace, Longman, updated 2nd edition, 2005, pp.307-17.
- HOLBROOKE Richard, To End a War, New York, Random House, 1998.
- MACLEOD Alex et ROUSSEL Stéphane (dir.), Intérêt national et responsabilités internationales : six Etats face au conflit en ex-Yougoslavie (1991-1995), Guérin universitaire, Montréal, 1996, 212 p.
- MUELLER John, “The banality of ‘Ethnic war’”, International Security, vol.25, n°1, Summer 2000, pp.42-70.
- ULLMAN Richard H., The World and Yugoslavia's Wars, Council on Foreign Relations Press, New York, 1996, 230 p.
- GLENNY Misha, The Balkans: Nationalism, War and the Great Powers, 1804-1999, London, Penguin Books, 2000.
- JUDAH Tim, The Serbs. History, Myth and the Destruction of Yugoslavia, New haven, Yale University Press, 1997.
- KAUFMANN Chaim, “Possible and Impossible Solutions to Ethnic Civil Wars”, International Security, vol.20, n°4, Spring 1996, pp.136-175.
- MOREAU DEFARGES Philippe, “Les organisations internationales et la crise yougoslave”, Politique étrangère, n° 2, été 1992, pp. 359-368.
- MOUSTAKIS Fotios, “Soft Security Threats in the New Europe: The Case of the Balkan Region”, European Security, vol.13, n°1-2, 2004, pp.139-156.
- PUGH Michael, “Bosnia and Herzegovina in South-east Europe” in Pugh (ed.), War Economies in a Regional Context: Challenges of Transformation, IPA-Lynne Rienner, 2003, pp. 1-23.
- STARK Hans, Les Balkans. Le retour de la guerre en Europe, Paris, Ifri-Dunod, 1993.
- TARDY Thierry, La France et la gestion des conflits yougoslaves (1991-1995). Enjeux et leçons d’une opération de maintien de la paix de l’ONU, Bruylant, Bruxelles, 1999.
- WESTERN Jon, “Sources of Humanitarian Intervention. Beliefs, Information, and Advocacy in the U.S. Decisions on Somalia and Bosnia”, International Security, vol.26, n°4, Spring 2002, pp. 112-142.
- “The Balkans in Europe’s Future”, International Commission on the Balkans, April 2005.
- Srebrenica: rapport sur un massacre, vol.1&2, Documents de l’Assemblée nationale, n°3413, Paris, 22 novembre 2001.
- Human Security Centre, “Human Security Report, 2005. War and Peace in the 21st Century”, The University of British Columbia, Canada, 2005.
III – EVOLUTIONS STRUCTURELLES ET OPERATIONNELLES DES INSTITUTIONS EUROPÉENNES DE SÉCURITÉ
Semaine du 30 Avril, 2007
Séance 7 – L'OTAN au Kosovo: Opération Illégale mais Légitime?
De L'Intervention Humanitaire à la 'Responsabilité de Protéger'
Thèmes d’exposé:
| 1. |
Légalité et légitimité des interventions militaires : le cas de l’opération de l’OTAN au Kosovo (‘Force alliée’, 1999) |
| 2. |
Portée et limites du concept de ‘responsabilité de protéger’ |
Lectures obligatoires:
- CHESTERMAN Simon, “Legality Versus Legitimacy: Humanitarian Intervention, the Security Council, and the Rule of Law”, Security Dialogue, vol.33, n°3, 2002, pp. 293–307.
- MACFARLANE Neil, THIELKING Carolin and Thomas WEISS, “The Responsibility to Protect: is anyone interested in humanitarian intervention?”, Third World Quarterly, vol.25, n°5, 2004, pp.977-992.
- Synopsis de “La responsabilité de protéger”, Commission internationale de l’intervention et de la souveraineté des Etats, Ottawa, décembre 2001.
et extrait du ‘Document final du Sommet mondial de 2005’, Nations unies, septembre 2005, p.33 (‘Devoir de protéger des populations contre le génocide, les crimes de guerre, le nettoyage ethnique et les crimes contre l’humanité’).
Lectures optionnelles:
- ANNAN Kofi, “Deux concepts de la souveraineté”, Le Monde, 22 septembre 1999.
- EVANS Gareth, “When is it Right to Fight ?”, Survival, vol.46, n°3, Fall 2004.
- FINNEMORE Martha, The Purpose of Intervention. Changing beliefs about the use of force, Ithaca, Cornell University Press, 2003.
- GLENNON Michael, Limits of Law, Prerogatives of Power. Interventionism after Kosovo, New York, Palgrave, 2001.
- HASSNER Pierre, “De la guerre et la paix à la violence et l’intervention : les contextes politiques passent, les dilemmes moraux demeurent”, in Hassner, La Terreur et l’Empire. La Violence et la paix II, Paris, Seuil, 2003, pp.114-137.
- ROBERTS Adam, “NATO’s ‘Humanitarian War’ over Kosovo”, Survival, vol.41, n°3, August 1999, pp.102-123.
- SIMMA Bruno, “NATO, the UN and the Use of Force : Legal Aspects”, European Journal of International Law, n°10, 1999, pp. 1-22.
- WEISS Thomas, “The Sunset of Humanitarian Intervention ? The Responsibility to Protect in a Unipolar Era”, Security Dialogue, vol.35, n°2, June 2004
- WILLIAMS Paul et Alex BELLAMY, “The Responsability to Protect and the Crisis in Darfur”, Security Dialogue, vol.36, n°1, March 2005.
- YOST David, “NATO and the Anticipatory Use of Force”, International Affairs, vol.39, n°1, 2007.
- Kosovo Report, Independent International Commission on Kosovo, Oxford, Oxford University Press, 2000.
- “La responsabilité de protéger”, Commission internationale de l’intervention et de la souveraineté des Etats, Ottawa, décembre 2001.
Mai 11, 2007, Vendredi (16h15-18h)
Séance 8 – La PESD : Institutions et Processus de Décision de la Gestion Civile et Militaire des Crises
Thèmes d’exposé:
| 1. |
Présentation didactique des institutions et processus de décision de la PESC et de la PESD |
| 2. |
La PESD marque-t-elle l’avènement de l’Union européenne en tant qu’acteur de la sécurité ? |
| 3. |
Dans quelle mesure la PESD contribue-t-elle à redéfinir l’intérêt national et la culture stratégique des Etats membres de l’Union européenne ? |
Lectures obligatoires:
- Rapport de la présidence sur la Politique européenne de sécurité et de défense, Conseil européen de Nice, 7-9 décembre 2000, 8 p.
- “A Secure Europe in a Better World”, European Security Strategy, Brussels, 12 December 2003, 16 pages.
- KING Anthony, “The Future of the European Security and Defence Policy”, Contemporary Security Policy, vol.26, n°1, April 2005, pp.44-61.
- TONRA Ben, “Constructing the CFSP: The Utility of a Cognitive Approach”, Journal of Common Market Studies, vol.41, n°4, September 2003. pp.731-56.
Lectures optionnelles:
- CHANDLER David (ed.), Peace without Politics ? Ten Years of International State-Building in Bosnia, Special Issue of International Peacekeeping, vol.12, n°3, Autumn 2005.
- CHANDLER David, “Imposing the Liberal Peace?”, International Peacekeeping, vol.11, n°1, printemps 2004.
- COLLARD-WEXLER Simon, “Integration under Anarchy: Neorealism and the European Union”, European Journal of International Relations, vol.12, n°3, 2006.
- COUSENS Elizabeth and Charles CATER, Toward Peace in Bosnia. Implementing the Dayton Accords, New York, International Peace Academy, 2001.
- DEIGHTON Anne, “The European Security and Defence Policy” in JHH Weiler, Iain Begg and John Peterson (eds.), Integration in an Expanding European Union: Reassessing the Fundamentals, Oxford, Blackwell, 2003, pp.275-293.
- EVERTS Steven, “The EU’s new security strategy is an important step forward”, European Affairs, winter 2004.
- GNESOTTO Nicole (ed.), EU Security and Defence Policy. The first five years (1999-2004), Paris, EU Institute for Security Studies, 2004.
- GUEROT Ulrike, “Europe could become the first ‘post-modern’ superpower”, European Affairs, Fall 2004.
- HEISBOURG Francois (ed.), “Europe Defence: Making it Work”, Chaillot Papers, vol. 42, September 2000.
- JONES Seth, “Ties that Bind: The Power Politics of European Security”, APSA, August 2001.
- KIRCHNER Emil, “The Challenge of European Union Security Governance”, Journal of Common Market Studies, vol.44, n°5, 2006, pp.947-968.
- MANNERS Ian, “Normative Power Europe Reconsidered: Beyond the Crossroads”, Journal of European Public Policy, vol.13, n°2, March 2006.
- MISSIROLI Antonio, “ESDP – How it Works”, in EU Security and Defence Policy. The first five years (1999-2004), Paris, EU Institute for Security Studies, 2004, pp.55-72.
- PARIS Roland, “Peacebuilding and the Limits of Liberal Internationalism”, International Security, vol.22, n°2, 1997, pp.54-89.
- POSEN Barry, “ESDP and the Structure of World Power”, The International Spectator, vol.XXXIX, n°1, 2004.
- POSEN Barry, “European Union Security and Defence Policy: Response to Unipolarity?”, Security Studies, vol.15, n°2, April-June 2006.
- SJURSEN Helene, “Understanding the Common Foreign and Security Policy. Analytical Building Blocks”, in KNODT Michèle and Sebastiaan PRINCEN (eds.), Understanding the European Union’s External Relations, London, Routledge, 2003, pp.35-53.
- WÆVER Ole, “The EU as a security actor: reflections from a pessimistic constructivist on post-sovereign security orders” in M. Kelstrup and M. Williams, eds., International Relations theory and the politics of European integration, New York: Routledge, 2000.
- WEBBER Mark et. al., “The governance of European security”, Review of International Studies, n°30, 2004, pp.3-26.
Mai 18, 2007, Vendredi (16h15-18h)
Séance 9 – Coopération Inter-Institutionnelle - Développements et Limites des Relations UE-OTAN, UE-ONU et OTAN-ONU
Thèmes d’exposé:
| 1. |
Les institutions européennes de sécurité et la problématique coopération-compétition. Analyse théorique et pratique. |
| 2. |
En quoi l’Union européenne a-t-elle besoin de l’ONU et de l’OTAN dans la gestion de la sécurité ? |
Lectures obligatoires:
- OYE Kenneth, “Explaining Cooperation under Anarchy: Hypotheses and Strategies”, in Oye (ed.), Cooperation under Anarchy, Princeton University Press, 1986, pp.1-24.
- CORNISCH Paul, EU and NATO: Co-operation or Competition?, Directorate-General for External Policies of the Union, European Parliament, 14 October 2006.
- TARDY Thierry, “EU-UN Cooperation in Peacekeeping. A Promising Relationship in a Constrained Environment”, in Martin Ortega (dir.), The EU and the UN: Partners in Effective Multilateralism, Cahiers de Chaillot, n°78, Institut d’Etudes de Sécurité de l’Union européenne, Paris, juin 2005.
Lectures optionnelles:
- ABBOTT Kenneth and Duncan SNIDAL, “Why States Act Through Formal International Organizations”, Journal of Conflict Resolution, vol.42, n°1, 1998, pp. 3-32.
- AXELROD Robert, The Evolution of Cooperation, New York, Basic Books, 1984.
- BAYLIS John, “European Security in the Post-Cold War Era: The Continuing Struggle between Realism and Utopianism”, European Security, vol. 7, n° 3, Autumn 1998, pp. 14-27.
- CROFT Stuart, “The EU, NATO and Europeanisation: The Return of Architectural Debate”, European Security, vol. 19, n° 3, Autumn 2000, pp. 1-20.
- GRIECO Joseph, “Anarchy and the Limits of Cooperation: A Realist Critique of the Newest Liberal Institutionalism,” International Organization, vol.42, n°3, Summer 1988, pp. 485-508.
- KEOHANE Robert and Lisa MARTIN, “The Promise of Institutionalist Theory,” International Security, vol.20, n°1, Summer 1995.
- KEOHANE Daniel, “Unblocking NATO-EU Co-operation”, CER Bulletin, Issue 48, June/July 2006.
- LAATIKAINEN Katie and Karen SMITH (eds.), The European Union at the United Nations. Intersecting Multilateralisms, Palgrave Macmillan, 2006.
- LEURDIJK Dick, “NATO and the UN. The Dynamics of an Evolving Relationship”, The RUSI Journal, vol.149, n°3, June 2004, pp. 24-28.
- MACE Catriona, “Operation Concordia: developing a 'European' approach to crisis management?”, International Peacekeeping, vol.11, n°3, Autumn 2004, pp. 474-490.
- MARTIN Lisa and Beth SIMMONS, “Theories and Empirical Studies of International Institutions,” International Organization, vol.52, n°4, Autumn 1998, pp. 729-757.
- MEARSHEIMER John, “The False Promise of International Institutions,” International Security, vol.19, no.3, Winter 1994/95, pp. 5-49.
- OYE Kenneth (ed.), Cooperation under Anarchy, Princeton, Princeton University Press, 1986.
- QUILLE Gerrard, “What does the EU agreement on operational planning mean for NATO?”, NATO Notes, vol.5, n°8, December 2003.
- REICHARD Martin, “Some Legal Issues Concerning the EU-NATO Berlin Plus Agreement”, Nordic Journal of International Law, vol.73, n°1, 2004, pp. 37-67.
- TARDY Thierry, “The Inherent Difficulties of Inter-Institutional Cooperation in the Fight against Terrorism”, in Thomas Weiss et Jane Boulden (dir.), The UN and Terrorism: Before and After 11 September, Indiana University Press, 2004, pp.120-148.
- de WET Erika, “The Relationship between the Security Council and Regional Organizations during Enforcement Action under Chapter VII of the United Nations Charter”, Nordic Journal of International Law, vol.71, n°1, 2002, pp. 1-37.
- WHITMAN Richard, “NATO, the EU and ESDP: an emerging division of labour?”, Contemporary Security Policy, vol.25, n.3, December 2004, pp.430-451.
IV – RELATIONS TRANSATLANTIQUES ET PERCEPTIONS NATIONALES
Mai 25, 2007, Vendredi (16h15-18h)
Séance 10 – Les Politiques Étatiques (Allemagne, France, Royaume-Uni, Russie, etc.)
Thèmes d’exposé:
| 1. |
Qu’est-ce qui fait l’exceptionnalisme de la politique de sécurité de la France ? |
| 2. |
L’Allemagne a-t-elle réussi sa ‘normalisation’ ? |
Lectures obligatoires:
- GOMART Thomas, “Vladimir Poutine ou les avatars de la politique étrangère russe”, Politique étrangère, 2003/3-4, automne-hiver 2003, pp. 789-802.
- HOWORTH Jolyon, “France, Britain and the Euro-Atlantic Crisis”, Survival, Vol. 45, No. 4, Winter 2003-2004, pp.173-92.
- RUDOLF Peter, “The Myth of the ‘German Way’ : German Foreign Policy and Transatlantic Relations”, Survival, vol.47, n°1, Spring 2005, pp.133-152.
-
Lectures optionnelles:
- AVERRE Derek, “Russia and the European Union: Convergence or Divergence?”, European Security, vol.14, n°2, June 2005, pp.175-202.
- BAEV P.K, “Instrumentalizing Counterterrorism for Regime Consolidation in Putin's Russia”, Studies in Conflict and Terrorism, vol.27, n°4, July-August 2004, pp. 337-52.
- BLANK Stephen, “An ambivalent war: Russia's war on terrorism”, Small Wars & Insurgencies, vol.14, n°1, March 2003, pp.127-50.
- BUKKVOLL Tor, “Putin's Strategic Partnership with the West: The Domestic Politics of Russian Foreign Policy”, Comparative Strategy, vol.22, n°3, July/August/September 2003, pp. 223-242.
- BURAS Piotr and Kerry LONGHURST, “The Berlin Republic, Iraq, and the Use of Force”, European Security, vol.13, n°3, 2004, pp. 215-245.
- CALDWELL Christopher, “Vedrinism: France's Global Ambition”, Policy Review, n°103, Oct.-Nov. 2000, pp1-12.
- CLARKE Michael, “French and British Security: Mirror Images in a Globalized World”, International Affairs, vol.76, n°4, Oct. 2000, pp. 725-740
- CORDEL Karl (ed.), Poland and the European Union, London, Routledge, 2000.
- DALGAARD-NIELSEN Anja, “Gulf War: The German Resistance”, Survival, vol.45, n°1, 2003, pp. 99-116.
- DEIGHTON Anne, “The foreign policy of British Prime Minister Tony Blair: radical or retrograde?”, Centre for British Studies, Humboldt University, Berlin, 11 July 2005, 13p.
- DRAKE Helen (ed.), French Relations with the European Union, Routledge, 2005.
- DUNNE Tim, “‘When the shooting starts’: Atlanticism in British security strategy”, International Affairs, vol.80, n°5, October 2004, pp. 893-909.
- GIEGERICH Bastian, PUSHKINA Darya and MOUNT Adam, “Towards a Strategic Partnership? The US and Russian Response to the European Security and Defence Policy”, Security Dialogue, vol.37, n°3, 2006.
- JEANBART Bruno, “Les opinions européennes face au traité constitutionnel”, Politique étrangère, 2005/2, pp.273-284.
- KAMPFNER John, Blair’s Wars, Bath, Free Press, 2003.
- KARP Regina, “The New German Foreign Policy Consensus”, The Washington Quarterly, vol.29, n°1, Winter 2005-06, pp.61-82.
- KOENIG-ARCHIBUGI Mathias, “Explaining Government Preferences for Institutional Change in EU Foreign and Security Policy”, International Organization, vol.58, Winter 2004, pp.137-174.
- MACLOED Alex, “Just defending national interests? Understanding French policy towards Iraq since the end of the Gulf War”, Journal of International Relations and Development, vol.7, n°4, December 2004, pp. 356-387.
- MENON Anand, “From Crisis to Catharsis: ESDP after Iraq”, International Affairs, Vol. 80, No. 4 (July 2004): pp. 631-48.
- MISKIMMON Alister, “Continuity in the Face of Upheaval—British Strategic Culture and the Impact of the Blair Government”, European Security, vol.13, n°3, 2004, pp. 273-99.
- OVERHAUS Marco, “In search of a post-hegemonic order: Germany, NATO and the European security and defence policy”, German Politics, vol.13, n°4, December 2004, pp. 551-568.
- RIEKER Pernille, “From Common Defence to Comprehensive Security: Towards the Europeanization of French Foreign and Security Policy?”, Security Dialogue, vol.37, n°4, 2006.
- STYAN David, “Jacques Chirac's 'non': France, Iraq and the United Nations, 1991-2003”, Modern and Contemporary France, vol.12, n°3, August 2004, pp.371-85.
- YOST David, “France’s Evolving Nuclear Strategy”, Survival, vol.47, n°3, Autumn 2005, pp.117-146.
- Dossier spécial de Politique étrangère, “Quelle politique étrangère pour la France ?”, hiver 2002-03.
Juin 1, 2007, Vendredi (16h15-18h)
Séance 11 – Relations Transatlantiques et Perceptions Américaines de la Sécurité Européenne
Thèmes d’exposé:
| 1. |
Commentez la phrase de Robert Kagan selon laquelle les Etats-Unis ‘vivent sur Mars’ et les Européens ‘vivent sur Venus’. |
| 2. |
La relation transatlantique et la crise de l’Irak (2002-2003). |
Lectures obligatoires:
- KAGAN Robert, “Power and Weakness”, Policy Review, No. 113, June & July 2002.
- MENON Anand, KALYPSO Nicolaidis and Jennifer WELSH, “In Defence of Europe – A Response to Kagan”, Journal of European Affairs, Vol.2, n°3, August 2004, pp. 5-14.
- SMITH Michael, “Taming the elephant? The European Union and the management of American power”, Perspectives on European Politics and Society, vol.6, n°1, 2005.
Lectures optionnelles:
- ASMUS Ronald, “Rethinking the EU: Why Washington Needs to Support European Integration”, Survival, vol.47, N°3, Autumn 2005, pp.93-101.
- ARCHICK Kristin, The United States and Europe: Possible Options for US Policy, Congressional Research Service, Report for Congress, Washington, DC, March 2005, 19 p.
- BLACKWILL Robert (ed.), The Future of Transatlantic Relations, Task Force Report, Council on Foreign Relations, 1999.
- DROZDIAK William, “The North Atlantic Drift”, Foreign Affairs, vol.84, n°1, Jan. 2005, pp.88-98.
- GORDON Philip and Jeremy SHAPIRO, Allies at War. America, Europe, and the Crisis over Iraq, New York, McGraw-Hill, 2004.
- JONES Erik, “Debating the transatlantic relationship: rhetoric and reality”, International Affairs, vol.80, n.4, 2004, pp.595-612.
- KAGAN Robert, “Power and Weakness”, Policy Review, No. 113, June & July 2002.
- KISSINGER, Henry, SUMMERS, Lawrence and Charles KUPCHAN: “Renewing the Atlantic partnership: report of an independent task force”, The Council on Foreign Relations, 2004.
- KUPCHAN Charles, The End of the American Era. US Foreign Policy and the Geopolitics of the Twenty-First Century, New York, A. Knopf, 2003.
- KUPCHAN Charles, “The Fourth Age: The Next Era in Transatlantic Relations”, The National Interest, September/October 2006.
- NYE Joseph, The Paradox of American Power. Why the World’s only Superpower can’t go it alone, Oxford, Oxford University Press, 2002.
- NYE Joseph, “US Power and Strategy after Iraq”, Foreign Affairs, vol.82, n°4, July/August 2003, pp. 60-73.
- SHAPIRO Jeremy and BYMAN Daniel, “Bridging the Transatlantic Counterterrorism Gap”, The Washington Quarterly, Autumn 2006.
- SMITH Michael, “Between two Worlds? The European Union, the United States and World Order”, International Politics, vol.41, 2004, pp.95-117.
- TARDY Thierry, “France and the US. The Inevitable Clash ?”, International Journal, vol.LIX, n°1, Winter 2003-04, pp.105-126.
- VAN OUDENAREN John, “Transatlantic bipolarity and the end of multilateralism”, Political Science Quarterly, vol.120, n.1, 2005, pp.1-32.
- WALT Stephen, “The Ties that Fray : Why Europe and America are Drifting Apart”, The National Interest, Winter 1998/99.
- ZABOROWSKI Marcin (ed.), Friends again? EU-US relations after the crisis, EU Institute for Security Studies, Paris, 2006.
V – SÉCURITÉ INTERNE VERSUS SÉCURITÉ EXTERNE
Juin 8, 2007, Vendredi (16h15-18h)
Séance 12 – La Menace Terroriste
Thèmes d’exposé:
| 1. |
La réponse de l’Union européenne au 11 Septembre 2001 |
| 2. |
Les organisations de sécurité ont-elles su s’adapter à la menace terroriste ? |
Lectures obligatoires:
- DEN BOER Monica and MONAR Jörg, “11 September and the Challenge of Global Terrorism to the EU as a Security Actor”, Journal of Common Market Studies, vol. 40, 2002, pp. 11-28.
- GUILD Elspeth, “International Terrorism and EU Immigration, Asylum and Borders Policy: The Unexpected Victims of 11 September 2001”, European Foreign Affairs Review, Vol. 8, No. 3, Fall 2003, pp. 331-46.
- WILKINSON Paul, International terrorism : the changing threat and the EU’s response, Chaillot Paper n°84, Paris, EU Institute for Security Studies, October 2005, pp. 29-46.
Lectures optionnelles:
- ALTENBURG Günther, “NATO in Crisis?”, Internationale Politik (Transatlantic edition), vol. 4, n°3, Autumn 2002, pp. 35-39.
- BERMAN Paul, Terror and Liberalism, New York, Norton and Company, 2003.
- DUKE Simon, “CESDP and the EU response to 11 September : Identifying the Weakest Link”, European Foreign Affairs Review, vol.7, n°2, Summer 2002, pp.153-169.
- FREEDMAN Lawrence (ed.), Superterrorism: Policy Responses, Blackwell Publishers, 2002.
- HEISBOURG François (dir.), Hyperterrorisme: la nouvelle guerre, Paris, Odile Jacob, 2001.
- HOFFMAN Bruce, “Does Our Counter-Terrorism Strategy Match the Threat?”, Testimony presented before the House International Relations Committee, Subcommittee on International Terrorism and Nonproliferation on September 29, 2005.
- KAPLAN Lawrence, NATO United, NATO Divided. The Evolution of an Alliance, Praeger Publishers, 2004.
- KEOHANE Daniel, The EU and Counter-Terrorism, Centre for European Reform, London, May 2005.
- KUPCHAN Charles, “The Waning Days of the Atlantic Alliance”, in Bertel Heurlin and Mikkel Vedby Rasmussen (eds.), Challenges and Capabilities – NATO in the 21st Century, Copenhagen, Danish Institute for International Studies, 2003.
- MONTAIN-DOMENACH Jacqueline, L’Europe et la sécurité intérieure, Paris, Montchrestien, Clefs politique, 1999, 158 p.
- NAUMANN Klaus, “9/11 and the Agenda for Prague”, Internationale Politik (Transatlantic edition), vol.3, n°2, Summer 2002, pp. 28-34.
- REINARES Fernando (ed.), European Democracies Against Terrorism. Governmental Policies and Intergovernmental Cooperation, Ashgate, 2000.
- SHEA Jamie, “NATO and Terrorism”, Royal United Services Institute Journal, vol.147, n°2, April 2002, pp. 32-40.
- TARDY Thierry (ed.), Peace Operations after 11 September 2001, London, Frank Cass, 2004.
- WILKINSON Paul (ed.), Terrorism Versus Democracy: The Liberal State Response, London, Frank Cass, 2000.
Semaine du 11 Juin, 2007, Vendredi (16h15-18h)
Séance 13 – Repenser la Sécurité : Crime Organisé, Migrations et Réponses des Acteurs de la Sécurité
Thèmes d’exposé:
| 1. |
Crime organisé et souveraineté de l’Etat en Europe |
| 2. |
Migrations, nouvelles menaces à la sécurité européenne ? |
Lectures obligatoires:
- BIGO Didier, “L’Europe de la sécurité intérieure. Penser autrement la sécurité”, pp.55-90, in LE GLOANNEC Anne-Marie (dir.), Entre Union et Nations. L’Etat en Europe, Paris, Presses de Science Po, 1998.
- BUZAN Barry and Ole WAEVER, “EU-Europe : the European Union and its ‘near abroad’”, pp.352-376, in BUZAN and WAEVER, Regions and Powers. The Structure of International Security, Cambridge, Cambridge University Press, 2003.
Lectures optionnelles:
- BADIE Bertrand et Catherine de WENDEN (dir.), Le défi migratoire, Paris, Presses de Science Po, 1994.
- BIGO Didier, “When two become one : internal and external securitisations in Europe”, in KELSTRUP Morten, WILLIAMS Michael (eds.), International Relations Theory and the Politics of European Integration. Power Security and Community, London, Routledge, 2000.
- DEN BOER, Monica and WALLACE, William: “Justice and Home Affairs: Integration through Incrementalism?” in Helen WALLACE and William WALLACE (eds.), Policy Making in the European Union, Oxford, Oxford University Press, 2000, pp. 493-518.
- DIEZ Thomas, STETTER Stephan and ALBERT Mathias, “The European Union and Border Conflicts: The Transformative Power of Integration”, International Organization, vol. 60, Summer 2006.
- EUROPOL, “2005 EU Organised Crime Report” (Public version), The Hague, 25 October 2005, 33 p.
- FALLETTI François et Frédéric DEBOVE, Planète criminelle. Le crime, phénomène social du siècle ?, Paris, PUF, 1998.
- FINDLAY Mark, The Globalisation of Crime. Understanding Transitional Relationships in Context, Cambridge, Cambridge University Press, 1999, 243 p.
- MILETITCH Nicolas, Trafics et crimes dans les Balkans, Paris, PUF, 1998.
- PAOLI Letizia and Cyrille FIJNAUT (eds.), Organised Crime in Europe: Concepts, Patterns and Policies in the European Union and Beyond, Dordrecht, Kluwer-Springer, 2004.
- SABATIER Magali, La coopération policière européenne, Paris, L’Harmattan, 2001, 512 p.
- SHELLEY Louise, "Transnational Organized Crime: An Imminent Threat to the Nation State?”, Journal of International Affairs, vol.48, n°2, Winter 1995, pp. 463-89.
- SHELLEY Louise, “Combating Transnational Crime and Corruption in Europe”, hearing before the US Senate Committee on Foreign Relations, Subcommittee on European Affairs. Testimony presented on October 30th, 2003.
- SIMON Duke and OJANEN Hanna, “Bridging Internal and External Security Lessons from the European Security and Defence Policy”, Journal of European Integration, vol.28, n°5, December 2006.
- de WENDEN Catherine, L’Europe des migrations, Paris, ADRI / La Documentation française, 2001 (coll. “Le Point sur”).
Bibliographie Générale
1. Manuels
- Informations dans syllabus
2. Monographies
- Informations dans syllabus
3. Articles
- Informations dans syllabus
4. Rapports de think tanks, instituts de recherché et organisations internationales
- Informations dans syllabus
5. Documents de référence
- Informations dans syllabus
6. Quelques sites internet
|
