Sécurité Européenne (E299)

Objectifs

 

Le Séminaire vise à étudier l'environnement européen de sécurité dans la période post-Guerre froide. L'objectif général est d'offrir un cadre contextuel et conceptuel au thème de la sécurité européenne par une approche de science politique combinant analyse théorique et études de cas.

 

L'objectif général est servi par l'analyse des éléments suivants :

  • concepts de sécurité (sécurité et défense collective, communauté de sécurité, sécurité régionale, culture stratégique, sécurité humaine, théorie des alliances, etc.) ;
  • théorie des relations internationales et sécurité européenne ;
  • principaux développements liés à la sécurité européenne ;
  • politiques publiques des Etats européens en matière de sécurité ;
  • mécanismes institutionnels et processus de décision des institutions européennes de sécurité (Union européenne et OTAN) ;
  • élaboration de la Politique étrangère et de sécurité commune (PESC) et de la Politique européenne de sécurité et de défense (PESD) de l'Union européenne ;
  • adaptation des acteurs de la sécurité face à l'évolution des menaces ;
  • crise et réforme de l'OSCE ;
  • relations transatlantiques ;
  • nature de l'architecture européenne de sécurité et relations inter-institutionnelles ;
  • relation entre sécurité interne et sécurité externe.

 

METHODE PEDAGOGIQUE – Structure des Séances

Le séminaire compte 13 séances.

Chaque séance (à l'exception de la séance d'introduction) se structure de la façon suivante :

  • un ou deux exposés (en fonction du nombre d'étudiants) fait(s) par les étudiants ;
  • débat avec le reste du groupe ;
  • reprise et conclusion par le chargé d'enseignement.

 

Les exposés et débats intègrent les concepts exposés dans les lectures et séances précédentes et favorisent l'analyse et la mise en perspective au détriment du descriptif.

 

 

Lectures

Tous les articles à lire en préparation des séances sont mis à disposition.

 

 

Evaluation

L'évaluation se fait selon les modalités suivantes :

  • participation orale : 30%
  • exposé écrit et oral : 70%

 

 

I – Introduction a la sécurité européenne

 

Séance 1 – Vendredi 22 février 2008 (16h15-18h)

Présentation du séminaire : objectifs, méthodologie, evaluation, bibliographie

 

2 – Vendredi 29 février 2008 (16h15-18h)

Sécurité, acteurs, menaces : introduction conceptuelle à la sécurité européenne

 

Thèmes d'exposé

1. Evolution et analyse critique des sujets de la sécurité.

2. Dans quelle mesure l'Europe est-elle un sujet/objet de la sécurité?

 

 

Lectures obligatoires

  • WALT Stephen, “The Renaissance of Security Studies”, International Studies Quarterly , vol.35, 1991, pp.211-239.
  • BALDWIN David, “Security Studies and the End of the Cold War”, World Politics , vol.48, n°1, Oct. 1995, pp.117-141.

 

Lectures optionnelles

  • BADIE Bertrand et Marie-Claude SMOUTS, “La dialectique de l'intégration / exclusion”, in Badie et Smouts, Le retournement du monde. Sociologie de la scène internationale , Paris, Presses de Science Po, 3è édition, 1999, pp.179-203.
  • BIGO Didier, “Nouveaux regards sur les conflits ?”, in Smouts (dir.), Les nouvelles relations internationales. Pratiques et théories , Paris, Presses de Science Po, 1998.
  • BUZAN Barry, People, States and Fear : An Agenda for International Security Studies in the Post-Cold War Era , 2 nd edition, Boulder, Lynne Rienner, 1991.
  • BUZAN Barry and Ole WAEVER, Regions and Powers. The Structure of International Security , Cambridge, Cambridge University Press, 2003, 564 p.
  • BUZAN Barry, WAEVER Ole and Jaap de WILDE, Security. A New Framework for Analysis , Boulder, Lynne Rienner, 1998.
  • CROFT Stuart and TERRIF Terry (eds.), Critical Reflections on Security and Change , London, Frank Cass, 2000.
  • DAVID Charles-Philippe, “Stratégie et sécurité à l'aube du XXIè siècle”, in David, La Guerre et la paix. Approches contemporaines de la sécurité et de la stratégie , Paris, Presses de Sciences Po, 2000, pp. 21-52.
  • DAVID Dominique, “Violence internationale : une scénographie nouvelle”, Ramsès , IFRI, Paris, 2000.
  • HOLSTI Kalevi, The State, War, and the State of War , Cambridge, Cambridge University Press, 1996.
  • KALDOR Mary, New and Old Wars. Organised Violence in a Global Era , Stanford, Stanford University Press, 2001.
  • KALDOR Mary, “Old Wars, Cold Wars, New Wars, and the War on Terror”, International Politics, vol.42, 2005, pp.491-498.
  • KEOHANE Robert and Joseph NYE, Power and Interdependence , New York, Longman, 3 rd edition, 2001.
  • KEOHANE Robert and Lisa MARTIN, “The Promise of Institutionalist Theory”, International Security , vol.20, n°1, Summer 1995, pp.39-51.
  • KRAUSE Keith and WILLIAMS Michael (eds.), Critical Security Studies , Minneapolis, Borderlines, 1997.
  • KRAUSE Keith and WILLIAMS Michael, “From Strategy to Security: Foundations of Critical Security Studies”, in KRAUSE and WILLIAMS (eds.), Critical Security Studies , Minneapolis , Borderlines, 1997.
  • LIPSCHUTZ Ronnie (ed.), On Security , New York, Columbia University Press, 1995.
  • McSWEENEY Bill, “The Meaning of Security”, in McSWEENEY, Security, Identity and Interests : A Sociology of International Relations , Cambridge, Cambridge University Press, 1999.
  • MEARSHEIMER John, “The False Promise of International Institutions”, International Security , vol.19, n°3, Winter 1994/95.
  • PARIS Roland, “Human Security: Paradigm Shift or Hot Air?”, International Security , vol.26, Fall 2001.
  • SALAME Ghassan, “Les guerres de l'après-guerre froide”, in Smouts (dir.), Les nouvelles relations internationales. Pratiques et théories , Paris, Presses de Science Po, 1998.
  • SMITH Steve, “The Increasing Insecurity of Security Studies : Conceptualizing Security in the Last Twenty Years”, Contemporary Security Studies , vol.20, n°3, Dec. 1999, pp.72-101.
  • STOET Peter, Human and Global Security: An Explanation of Terms , Toronto, University of Toronto Press, 1999.
  • WALLENDER Celeste and Robert KEOHANE, “Risk, Threat and Security Institutions”, in Helga Heftebdorn, Robert O. Keohane, and Celeste A. Wallander (eds.), Imperfect Unions: Security Institutions over Time and Space , New York, Oxford University Press, 1999, pp.21-47.
  • WAEVER Ole, “Securitization and Desecuritization”, in LIPSCHUTZ Ronnie (ed.), On Security , New York, Columbia University Press, 1995.
  • WAEVER Ole, “The EU as a security actor. Reflections from a pessimistic constructivist on post-sovereign security orders”, in Morten Kelstrup and Michael Williams, eds., International Relations Theory and the Politics of European Integration , Routledge, London , 2000.
  • WALKER R.B.J., “The Subject of Security”, in KRAUSE Keith and WILLIAMS Michael (eds.), Critical Security Studies , Minneapolis, Borderlines, 1997.
  • United Nations Development Program, Human Development Report , 1994.
  • Canada Department of Foreign Affairs and International Trade, Human Security: Safety for People in a Changing World , Ottawa, April 1999.
  • The Barcelona Report of the Study Group on Europe's Security Capabilities. “A Human Security Doctrine for Europe”, Barcelona, 15 September 2004.
  • “The Future of Strategy and War”, special issue of Survival , n°4, hiver 1998-99.
  • Human Security Centre, “ Human Security Report, 2005. War and Peace in the 21 st Century”, The University of British Columbia, Canada, 2005.

 

 

Séance 3 – Vendredi 7 mars 2008 (16h15-18h)

L'environnement européen de sécurité pendant la guerre froide : dépendance stratégique entre l'Europe et les Etats-Unis

 

Thèmes d'exposé

1. Dans quelle mesure la guerre froide a-t-elle façonné l'approche européenne des questions de sécurité ?

2. Analyse critique de l'architecture européenne de sécurité pendant la guerre froide.

 

Lectures obligatoires

  • BOOTH Ken, “Cold Wars of the Mind”, in BOOTH (ed.), Statecraft and Security : the Cold War and Beyond , Cambridge, Cambridge University Press, 1998, pp. 29-55.
  • JOFFE Joseph, “Europe's American Pacifier”, Foreign Policy , Spring 1984, pp. 64-82.

 

Lectures optionnelles

  • ARON Raymond, Paix et guerre entre les nations , Calmann-Lévy, 1962.
  • ART Robert and Kenneth WALTZ (eds.), The Use of Force. Military Power and International Politics , 4 th edition, University Press of America, 1993.
  • BALL Margaret, NATO and the European Union Movement , Westport, Greenwood Press, 1974.
  • BERTRAM Christoph, Europe in the Balance: Securing the Peace Won in the Cold War , Washington, DC, Carnegie Endowment for International Peace, 1995.
  • BOOTH (ed.), Statecraft and Security : the Cold War and Beyond , Cambridge, Cambridge University Press, 1998.
  • DAALDER Ivo, The Nature and Practice of Flexible Response: NATO Strategy and Theatre Nuclear Forces Since 1967 , New York, Columbia University Press, 1991.
  • DOBSON Alan (ed.), Deconstructing and Reconstructing the Cold War , Brookfield, Ashgate, 1999.
  • FREEDMAN Lawrence, The Evolution of Nuclear Strategy , New York, St. Martin's Press, 1983.
  • GADDIS John Lewis, The Long Peace. Inquiries into the History of the Cold War , Oxford University Press, 1989, 352 p.
  • GADDIS John Lewis, “Spheres of Influences : The United States and Europe , 1945-1949”, pp.48-71, in Gaddis, The Long Peace. Inquiries into the History of the Cold War , Oxford University Press, 1987.
  • HOLSTI Kaveli, Peace and War. Armed Conflicts and International Order, 1648-1989 , Cambridge, Cambridge University Press, 1991.
  • McGEORGE Bundy, Danger and Survival: Choices About the Bomb in the First Fifty Years , New York, Random House, 1988.
  • RISTE Olav, Western Security: The Formative Years: European and Atlantic Defense 1947-1953 , New York, Columbia University Press, 1985.
  • SAGAN Scott and WALTZ Kenneth, The Spread of Nuclear Weapons : A Debate , WW Norton, 1995.
  • WOHLSTETTER Albert, “The Delicate Balance of Terror”, Foreign Affairs , vol.37, n°2, January 1959.

 

 

II – La Fin de la Guerre Froide et les conséquences sur la sécurité en Europe

 

Séance 4 – Semaine du 10 mars 2008

L'émergente architecture européenne de sécurité.

L'Union européenne et la PESC, sécurité régionale et ‘communauté de sécurité'

 

Thèmes d'exposé

1. La PESC fait-elle de l'Union européenne une ‘communauté de sécurité' ?

2. L'Union européenne et la prévention des conflits

 

Lectures obligatoires

  • ADLER Emmanuel and Michael BARNETT, “Security Communities in theoretical perspectives”, in Adler and Barnett, Security Communities , Cambridge, Cambridge University Press, 1998, pp.3-28.
  • SCHWOK René, Théories de l'intégration européenne , Paris, Montchrestien, coll. Clefs-Politique, 2005, pp.21-121.
  • Traité de Maastricht, titre V (PESC), 1992.

 

Lectures optionnelles

  • BURGESS Peter, “ The insecurity of the community of values: The European Union as a Security Community”, in Hans Günter Brauch et alii (eds.) Globalisation and Environmental Challenges: Reconceptualising Security in the 21st Century , Berlin , Springer-Verlag, 2006.
  • ADLER Emmanuel and Michael BARNETT, Security Communities , Cambridge, Cambridge University Press, 1998, 462 p.
  • BAUN Michael, “The Maastricht Treaty as High Politics : Germany , France and European Integration”, Political Science Quarterly , Winter 1995/96, pp.605-624.
  • DEUTSCH Karl et al. , Political Community and the North Atlantic Area. International Organization in the Light of Historical Experience , New York, Greenwood Press, 1957.
  • DWAN Renata, “Conflict Prevention”, in SIPRI Yearbook 2002 , Oxford University Press, 2002.
  • HAAS Ernst, The Uniting of Europe . Political, Social, and Economic Forces, 1950-1957 , University of Notre Dame Press, 3 rd edition, 2004.
  • HYDE-PRICE Adrian, “‘Normative' power Europe: a realist critique”, Journal of European Public Policy , 13:2, March 2006, 217–234.
  • KRONENBERG Vincent and Jan WOUTERS (eds.), The EU and Conflict Prevention: Policy and Legal Aspects , The Hague, TMC Asser Press, 2004.
  • LEQUESNE Christian et Yves SUREL (dir.), L'intégration européenne. Entre émergence institutionnelle et recomposition de l'Etat , Paris, Science Po Les Presses, 2004, 291 p.
  • MITRANY David, A Working Peace System. An Argument for the Functional Development of International Organization , Londres, Royal Institute of International Affairs, 1943.
  • MÖLLER Frank, “Capitalizing on Difference: A Security Community or/as a Western Project”, Security Dialogue , vol.34, n°3, September 2003, pp.315-28.
  • MORAVCSIK Andrew, “The European Constitutional Compromise and the Neofunctionalist Legacy”, Journal of European Public Policy , vol.12, n°2, April 2005, pp.349-386.

 

 

Séance 5 – Vendredi 4 avril 2008 (16h15-18h)

défense collective, théorie des alliances, Gestion de crises : De la pertinence de l'OTAN après la guerre froide

 

Thèmes d'exposé

1. Pourquoi l'OTAN a-t-elle survécu à la fin de la Guerre froide ?

2. Des Balkans à l'Afghanistan : Bilan de 15 ans de gestion des crises par l'OTAN

 

Lectures obligatoires

  • WALLANDER Celeste, “Institutional Assets and Adaptability: NATO After the Cold War”, International Organization , vol. 54, n°4, Autumn 2000, pp. 705-735.
  • ASMUS, Ronald and Richard HOLBROOKE, “Re-Inventing NATO”, Riga Papers , The German Marshall Fund of the United States, November 2006, pp. 1-16.

 

Lectures optionnelles

  • BARANY Zoltan, “NATO's Post-Cold War Metamorphosis. From Sixteen to Twenty-six and counting”, International Studies Review , vol.8, n°1, March 2006, pp. 165-178.
  • DAALDER Ivo and GOLDGEIER James, “Global NATO”, Foreign Affairs , vol.85, n°5, Sept./Oct. 2006.
  • DUFFIELD John, “NATO's Functions after the Cold War”, Political Science Quarterly , vol.109, n°5, Winter 1994/95, pp.763-787.
  • GENTRY John, “Norms and Military Power: NATO's War against Yugoslavia”, Security Studies , vol.15, n°2, April-June 2006.
  • GLASER Charles, “Why NATO is Still Best : Future Security Arrangements for Europe ”, International Security , vol.18, n°1, Summer 1993, pp. 5-50.
  • JOYCE Mark, “NATO's Return to Politics”, The RUSI Journal , vol.150, n°3, June 2005, pp.10-14.
  • KAY Sean, “ What Went Wrong with NATO?”, Cambridge Review of International Affairs , vol.18, n°1, April 2005, pp.69-83.
  • KAY Sean, “NATO, the Kosovo War, and Neoliberal Theory”, Contemporary Security Policy , vol.25, n°2, pp.252-279.
  • LEPGOLD Joseph, “NATO's Post-Cold War Collective Action Problem”, International Security , vol.23, n°1, Summer 1998, pp.78-106.
  • McCALLA Robert, “NATO's Persistence after the Cold War”, International Organization , vol.50, n°3, Summer 1996, pp.445-475.
  • MEARSHEIMER John, “Back to the Future : Instability in Europe after the Cold War”, International Security , vol.15, n°1, Summer 1990, pp. 5-56.
  • PRESS-BARNATHAN Galia, “Managing the Hegemon: NATO under Unipolarity”, Security Studies , vol.15, n° 2, April-June 2006.
  • RATTI Luca, “Post-cold War NATO and International Relations Theory: The Case for Neo-Classical Realism”, Journal of Transatlantic Studies , vol. 4, n°1, 2006.
  • RISSE-KAPPEN Thomas, “Collective Identity in a Democratic Community. The Case of NATO”, in KATZENSTEIN Peter (ed.), The Culture of National Security. Norms and Identities of World Politics , New York, Columbia University Press, 1996.
  • RÜHLE Michael, “The Evolution of NATO: Expanding the Transatlantic Toolkit”, American Foreign Policy Interests , Vol. 29, n°4, 2007, pp. 237-242.
  • SCHMIDT John, “Last Alliance Standing? NATO after 9/11”, The Washington Quarterly , vol. 30, n°1, Winter 2006/2007.
  • TARDY Thierry, “La gestion des crises : un nouveau défi pour l'OTAN”, La Revue internationale et stratégique, n° 32, décembre 1998.
  • TERTRAIS Bruno, “The Changing Nature of Military Alliances”, Washington Quarterly , Vol. 27, No. 2 (Spring 2004): pp. 135-149.
  • VAN EVERA Stephen, “Primed for Peace : Europe after the Cold War”, International Security , Winter 1990/91, pp. 7-50.
  • WALLENDER Celeste, “Institutional Assets and Adaptability: NATO after the Cold War”, International Organization , vol.54, n°4, Autumn 2000, pp.705-735.
  • WALT Stephen, “The Precarious Partnership: America and Europe in a New Era”, in Charles Kupchan (ed.), Atlantic Security: Contending Visions , Council on Foreign Relations, 1998, pp.5-44.
  • WALT Stephen, “The Ties that Fray : Why Europe and America are Drifting Apart”, The National Interest , Winter 1998/99, pp.3-11.
  • YOST David, “NATO and the Anticipatory Use of Force”, International Affairs , vol.39, n°1, 2007.

 

 

Séance 6 – Vendredi 11 avril 2007 (16h15-18h)

Genèse et gestion des conflits Yougoslaves : Limites institutionnelles

 

Thèmes d'exposé

1. En quoi les conflits yougoslaves sont-ils caractéristiques de l'évolution de l'environnement international post-guerre froide ?

2. Leçons apprises de la gestion des conflits yougoslaves par les acteurs étatiques (Etats et organisations internationales).

 

Lectures obligatoires

  • BUSH Kenneth and KEYMAN Fuat, “Identity-Based Conflict: Rethinking Security in a Post-Cold War World, Global Governance , n°3, 1997.
  • GHEBALI Victor, “La cogestion du conflit yougoslave par les organisations internationales : beaucoup de bruit pour rien”, Le Trimestre du monde , 1993/4, n° 24, pp. 167-184.

 

Lectures optionnelles

  • BATT Judy (ed.), The Western Balkans: Moving On , Paris, EU Institute for Security Studies, Oct. 2004.
  • BIEBER Florian and Zidas DASKALOVSKI, Understanding the War in Kosovo , London, Frank Cass, 2003.
  • BOUGAREL Xavier, Bosnie. Anatomie d'un conflit , Paris, La Découverte, 1996.
  • BROWN Michael, COTE Owen, LYNN-JONES Sean and Steven MILLER (eds.), Nationalism and Ethnic Conflict. An international Security Reader , Cambridge, MIT Press, 2001, 491 p.
  • CLARK Wesley, Waging Modern War. Bosnia, Kosovo, and the Future of Combat , New York, PublicAffairs, 2001.
  • GELLNER Ernest, “Nations and Nationalism”, in BETTS Richard, Conflict after the Cold War. Arguments on Causes of War and Peace , Longman, updated 2 nd edition, 2005, pp.307-17.
  • HOLBROOKE Richard, To End a War , New York, Random House, 1998.
  • MACLEOD Alex et ROUSSEL Stéphane (dir.), Intérêt national et responsabilités internationales : six Etats face au conflit en ex-Yougoslavie (1991-1995) , Guérin universitaire, Montréal, 1996, 212 p.
  • MUELLER John, “The banality of ‘Ethnic war'”, International Security , vol.25, n°1, Summer 2000, pp.42-70.
  • ULLMAN Richard H., The World and Yugoslavia's Wars , Council on Foreign Relations Press, New York, 1996, 230 p.
  • GLENNY Misha, The Balkans: Nationalism, War and the Great Powers, 1804-1999 , London, Penguin Books, 2000.
  • JUDAH Tim, The Serbs. History, Myth and the Destruction of Yugoslavia , New haven, Yale University Press, 1997.
  • KAUFMANN Chaim, “Possible and Impossible Solutions to Ethnic Civil Wars”, International Security , vol.20, n°4, Spring 1996, pp.136-175.
  • MOREAU DEFARGES Philippe, “Les organisations internationales et la crise yougoslave”, Politique étrangère , n° 2, été 1992, pp. 359-368.
  • MOUSTAKIS Fotios, “Soft Security Threats in the New Europe: The Case of the Balkan Region”, European Security , vol.13, n°1-2, 2004, pp.139-156.
  • POSEN Barry, “The Security Dilemma and Ethnic Conflict”, Survival , Spring 1993.
  • PUGH Michael, “Bosnia and Herzegovina in South-east Europe” in Pugh (ed.), War Economies in a Regional Context: Challenges of Transformation , IPA-Lynne Rienner, 2003, pp. 1-23.
  • STARK Hans, Les Balkans. Le retour de la guerre en Europe , Paris, Ifri-Dunod, 1993.
  • TARDY Thierry , La France et la gestion des conflits yougoslaves (1991-1995). Enjeux et leçons d'une opération de maintien de la paix de l'ONU , Bruylant, Bruxelles, 1999.
  • WESTERN Jon, “Sources of Humanitarian Intervention. Beliefs, Information, and Advocacy in the U.S. Decisions on Somalia and Bosnia”, International Security , vol.26, n°4, Spring 2002, pp. 112-142.
  • “The Balkans in Europe's Future”, International Commission on the Balkans, April 2005.
  • Srebrenica: rapport sur un massacre , vol.1&2, Documents de l'Assemblée nationale, n°3413, Paris, 22 novembre 2001.
  • Human Security Centre, “ Human Security Report, 2005. War and Peace in the 21 st Century”, The University of British Columbia, Canada, 2005.

 

 

III – EVOLUTIONS STRUCTURELLES et OPERATIONNELLES des institutions européennes de sécurité

 

Séance 7 – Date à déterminer

L'OTAN au Kosovo : opération illégale mais légitime ?

De l'intervention humanitaire à la ‘responsabilité de protéger'

 

Thèmes d'exposé

1. Légalité et légitimité des interventions militaires : le cas de l'opération de l'OTAN au Kosovo (‘Force alliée', 1999)

2. Portée et limites du concept de ‘responsabilité de protéger'

 

Lectures obligatoires

  • CHESTERMAN Simon, “Legality Versus Legitimacy: Humanitarian Intervention, the Security Council, and the Rule of Law”, Security Dialogue , vol.33, n°3, 2002, pp. 293–307.
  • MACFARLANE Neil, THIELKING Carolin and Thomas WEISS, “ The Responsibility to Protect : is anyone interested in humanitarian intervention?”, Third World Quarterly , vol.25, n°5, 2004, pp.977-992.
  • Synopsis de “La responsabilité de protéger”, Commission internationale de l'intervention et de la souveraineté des Etats, Ottawa, décembre 2001. et extrait du ‘Document final du Sommet mondial de 2005', Nations unies, septembre 2005, p.33 (‘Devoir de protéger des populations contre le génocide, les crimes de guerre, le nettoyage ethnique et les crimes contre l'humanité').

 

Lectures optionnelles

  • ANNAN Kofi, “Deux concepts de la souveraineté”, Le Monde , 22 septembre 1999.
  • EVANS Gareth, “When is it Right to Fight ?”, Survival , vol.46, n°3, Fall 2004.
  • FINNEMORE Martha, The Purpose of Intervention. Changing beliefs about the use of force , Ithaca, Cornell University Press, 2003.
  • GLENNON Michael, Limits of Law, Prerogatives of Power. Interventionism after Kosovo , New York, Palgrave, 2001.
  • HASSNER Pierre, “De la guerre et la paix à la violence et l'intervention : les contextes politiques passent, les dilemmes moraux demeurent”, in Hassner, La Terreur et l'Empire. La Violence et la paix II , Paris, Seuil, 2003, pp.114-137.
  • ROBERTS Adam, “NATO's ‘Humanitarian War' over Kosovo”, Survival , vol.41, n°3, August 1999, pp.102-123.
  • SIMMA Bruno, “NATO, the UN and the Use of Force : Legal Aspects”, European Journal of International Law , n°10, 1999, pp. 1-22.
  • WEISS Thomas, “The Sunset of Humanitarian Intervention ? The Responsibility to Protect in a Unipolar Era”, Security Dialogue , vol.35, n°2, June 2004
  • WILLIAMS Paul et Alex BELLAMY, “The Responsability to Protect and the Crisis in Darfur”, Security Dialogue , vol.36, n°1, March 2005.
  • YOST David, “NATO and the Anticipatory Use of Force”, International Affairs , vol.39, n°1, 2007.
  • Kosovo Report , Independent International Commission on Kosovo, Oxford, Oxford University Press, 2000.
  • “La responsabilité de protéger”, Commission internationale de l'intervention et de la souveraineté des Etats, Ottawa, décembre 2001.

 

 

Séance 8 – Semaine du 21 avril 2008

L'Union européenne et la gestion civile et militaire des crises : Institutions, processus de décision, opérations. Vers une culture stratégique européenne ?

 

Thèmes d'exposé

1. Présentation didactique des institutions et processus de décision de la PESC et de la PESD

2. La PESD marque-t-elle l'avènement de l'Union européenne en tant qu'acteur de la sécurité, disposant d'une culture stratégique ?

 

Lectures obligatoires

  • Rapport de la présidence sur la Politique européenne de sécurité et de défense, Conseil européen de Nice, 7-9 décembre 2000, 8 p.
  • “A Secure Europe in a Better World”, European Security Strategy , Brussels, 12 December 2003, 16 pages.
  • HOWORTH Jolyon, “Towards a European Strategic Culture?” (pp.178-206), and “Back to the Front? The EU's Overseas Missions” (pp.207-241), in Security and Defence Policy in the European Union , London & New York , Palgrave, 2007.

 

Lectures optionnelles

  • Bailes , Alyson, “The European Security Strategy. An Evolutionary History”, SIPRI Policy Paper , No.10, Stockholm , Feb. 2005.
  • BISCOP, Sven, “The ABC of European Union Strategy: Ambition, Benchmark, Culture”, Egmont Paper 16 , Brussels , October 2007.
  • BISCOP Sven and Andersson Jan Joel (eds.), The EU and the European Security Strategy. Forging a Global Europe , Routledge, 2007.
  • CHANDLER David (ed.), Peace without Politics ? Ten Years of International State-Building in Bosnia, Special Issue of International Peacekeeping , vol.12, n°3, Autumn 2005.
  • CHANDLER David, “Imposing the Liberal Peace?”, International Peacekeeping , vol.11, n°1, printemps 2004.
  • COLLARD-WEXLER Simon, “Integration under Anarchy: Neorealism and the European Union”, European Journal of International Relations , vol.12, n°3, 2006.
  • Cornish , Paul and Geoffrey Edwards , “The strategic culture of the European Union: a progress report”, International Affairs , 81/4, 2005.
  • COUSENS Elizabeth and Charles CATER, Toward Peace in Bosnia. Implementing the Dayton Accords , New York, International Peace Academy, 2001.
  • DEIGHTON Anne, “The European Security and Defence Policy” in JHH Weiler, Iain Begg and John Peterson (eds.), Integration in an Expanding European Union: Reassessing the Fundamentals , Oxford, Blackwell, 2003, pp.275-293.
  • EVERTS Steven, “The EU's new security strategy is an important step forward”, European Affairs, winter 2004.
  • EVERTS Steven, Lawrence FREEDMAN, Charles GRANT, François HEISBOURG, Daniel KEOHANE and Michael O'HANLON, A European Way of War , London, Centre for European Reform, 2004.
  • GIBERT Marie, “Monitoring a region in crisis: the EU in West Africa ”, Chaillot Paper 96 , 2007.
  • GNESOTTO Nicole (ed.), EU Security and Defence Policy. The first five years (1999-2004) , Paris, EU Institute for Security Studies, 2004.
  • GRANT Charles, “Preparing for the the multipolar world : European foreign and security policy in 2020”, Centre for European Reform, London , December 2007.
  • GUEROT Ulrike, “Europe could become the first ‘post-modern' superpower”, European Affairs , Fall 2004.
  • HEISBOURG Francois (ed.), “Europe Defence: Making it Work”, Chaillot Papers , vol. 42, September 2000.
  • HOWORTH Jolyon, Security and Defence Policy in the European Union , London & New York , Palgrave, 2007.
  • JONES Seth, “Ties that Bind: The Power Politics of European Security”, APSA, August 2001.
  • KING Anthony, “The Future of the European Security and Defence Policy”, Contemporary Security Policy , vol.26, n°1, April 2005, pp.44-61.
  • KIRCHNER Emil, “The Challenge of European Union Security Governance”, Journal of Common Market Studies , vol.44, n°5, 2006, pp.947-968.
  • Lindstrom , Gustav, “Enter the EU Battlegroups”, Chaillot Paper , n°97, 2007.
  • MANNERS Ian, “Normative Power Europe Reconsidered: Beyond the Crossroads”, Journal of European Public Policy , vol.13, n°2, March 2006.
  • MEYER, Christoph, The Quest for a European Strategic Culture. Changing Norms on Security and Defence in the European Union , London : Palgrave Macmillan, 2006.
  • MISSIROLI Antonio, “ESDP – How it Works”, in EU Security and Defence Policy. The first five years (1999-2004) , Paris, EU Institute for Security Studies, 2004, pp.55-72.
  • PARIS Roland, “Peacebuilding and the Limits of Liberal Internationalism”, International Security , vol.22, n°2, 1997, pp.54-89.
  • POSEN Barry, “ESDP and the Structure of World Power”, The International Spectator , vol.XXXIX, n°1, 2004.
  • POSEN Barry, “European Union Security and Defence Policy: Response to Unipolarity?”, Security Studies , vol.15, n°2, April-June 2006.
  • RYNNING Sten, “The European Union: Towards a Strategic Culture?”, Security Dialogue , vol.34, n°4, December 2003.
  • SMITH, Michael, “The Shock of the Real? Trends in European Foreign and Security Policy since September 2001”, in Giovanna Bono (ed.), The Impact of 9/11 on European Foreign and Security Policy , Institute for European Studies, Vrije Universiteit Brussel, 2006.
  • SJURSEN Helene, “Understanding the Common Foreign and Security Policy. Analytical Building Blocks”, in KNODT Michèle and Sebastiaan PRINCEN (eds.), Understanding the European Union's External Relations , London, Routledge, 2003, pp.35-53.
  • TONRA Ben, “Constructing the CFSP: The Utility of a Cognitive Approach”, Journal of Common Market Studies , vol.41, n°4, September 2003. pp.731-56.
  • Wæver Ole, “The EU as a security actor: reflections from a pessimistic constructivist on post-sovereign security orders” in M. Kelstrup and M. Williams, eds., International Relations theory and the politics of European integration , New York: Routledge, 2000.
  • WEBBER Mark et. al., “The governance of European security”, Review of International Studies, n°30, 2004, pp.3-26.

 

 

Séance 9 – Vendredi 2 mai 2008 (16h15-18h)

L'OSCE, entre crise et réforme

 

Thèmes d'exposé

1. L'OSCE est-elle pertinente face à l'évolution des menaces à la sécurité ?

2. La Russie et l'OSCE.

 

Lectures obligatoires

  • GHEBALI Victor-Yves, “The Reform of the OSCE: Problems, Challenges and Risks”, in GHEBALI and WARNER (eds.), The Reform of the OSCE 15 years after the Charter of Paris for a new Europe : Problems, Challenges and Risks , PSIO Occasional Paper 2, Geneva , 2006.
  • ZELLNER Wolfgang, "Redefining the OSCE's Future: Strategic Uncertainty and Political Contradictions Are Delaying Progress", Conflicts, Security and Cooperation. Liber Amicorum Victor-Yves Ghebali , Brussels , Bruylant, 2007.

 

Lectures optionnelles

  • BARRY Robert, “The Future of the OSCE”, BASIC Special Report , British American Security Information Council, March 2003.
  • BRENNINKMEIJER Olivier, “The OSCE High Commissioner on National Minorities: Negotiating the 1992 Conflict Prevention Mandate”, PSIO Occasional Paper 5 , HEI, Geneva , 2005.
  • DUNAY Pal, “The OSCE in Crisis”, Chaillot Paper 88 , Paris, 2006.
  • GHEBALI Victor-Yves and Daniel WARNER (eds.), The Reform of the OSCE 15 years after the Charter of Paris for a new Europe : Problems, Challenges and Risks , PSIO Occasional Paper 2, Geneva , 2006.
  • GHEBALI Victor-Yves, “The Russian Factor in OSCE Crisis: A Fair Examination”, Helsinki Monitor , vol.16, n°3, 2005, pp.184-187.
  • GHEBALI Victor-Yves, “ The Role of the OSCE in Conflict Management: Some Reflections on the Case of ‘Frozen Conflicts'”, in Warner and Clerc (eds.), Challenges faced by the OSCE in the Year 2001 , PSIO Occasional Paper, 2002.
  • ISCHINGER Wolfgang, “The OSCE in the European Concert”, OSCE Yearbook 2000 , Institute for Peace Research and Security Policy at the University of Hamburg , Baden-Baden , Nomos.
  • OSCE Yearbook 2003 , Institute for Peace Research and Security Policy at the University of Hamburg , Baden-Baden , Nomos, 2004.
  • OSCE Yearbook 2004 , Institute for Peace Research and Security Policy at the University of Hamburg , Baden-Baden , Nomos, 2005.
  • WARNER Daniel (ed.), “Consolidating the OSCE”, PSIO Occasional Paper 4 , HEI, Geneva , 2006.
  • WARNER Daniel (ed.), “The OSCE at a Turning Point: OSCE chairmanship and Other Challenges”, PSIO Occasional Paper 4, 2007.
  • ZELLNER, Wolfgang: “Managing Change in Europe. Evaluating the OSCE and its Future Role: Competencies, Capabilities, and Missions”, CORE Working Paper 13 , Hamburg : Centre for OSCE Research, Institute for Peace Research and Security Policy, 2005.
  • ZELLNER Wolfgang: " Russia and the OSCE : From High Hopes to Disillusionment", Cambridge Review of International Relations , 18 (3), 2005.
  • OSCE Charter for European Security, Istanbul , November 1999. http://www.osce.org/docs/english/1990-1999/summits/istachart99e.htm
  • “Common Purpose. Towards a More Effective OSCE”, Final Report and Recommendations of the Panel of Eminent Persons on Strengthening the Effectiveness of the OSCE, 27 June 2005 .

 

 

IV – Relations transatlantiques et perceptions nationales

 

Séance 10 – Vendredi 9 mai 2008 (16h15-18h)

Les politiques étatiques (Allemagne, France, Royaume-Uni, Russie, etc.)

 

Thèmes d'exposé

1. Qu'est-ce qui fait l'exceptionnalisme de la politique de sécurité de la France ?

2. L'Allemagne a-t-elle réussi sa ‘normalisation' ?

 

Lectures obligatoires

  • NIBLETT Robin, “Choosing between America and Europe : a new context for British foreign policy”, International Affairs , vol. 83 , n°4, July 2007, pp. 627-641.
  • CASIER Tom, “Putin's Policy towards the West: Reflections on the Nature of Russian Foreign Policy”, International Politics , vol.43, n°3, July 2006, pp.384-401.

 

Lectures optionnelles

  • AVERRE Derek, “Russia and the European Union: Convergence or Divergence?”, European Security , vol.14, n°2, June 2005, pp.175-202.
  • BAEV P.K, “Instrumentalizing Counterterrorism for Regime Consolidation in Putin's Russia”, Studies in Conflict and Terrorism , vol.27, n°4, July-August 2004, pp. 337-52.
  • BLANK Stephen, “An ambivalent war: Russia's war on terrorism”, Small Wars & Insurgencies , vol.14, n°1, March 2003, pp.127-50.
  • BOWEN Norman, “Multilateralism, Multipolarity, and Regionalism: The French Foreign Policy Discourse”, Mediterranean Quarterly, Winter 2005, pp. 94-116
  • BUKKVOLL Tor, “Putin's Strategic Partnership with the West: The Domestic Politics of Russian Foreign Policy”, Comparative Strategy , vol.22, n°3, July/August/September 2003, pp. 223-242.
  • BURAS Piotr and Kerry LONGHURST, “The Berlin Republic, Iraq, and the Use of Force”, European Security , vol.13, n°3, 2004, pp. 215-245.
  • CHARILLON Frédéric, “Politique étrangère de la France : l'heure des choix”, Politique étrangère , 1/2007.
  • CALDWELL Christopher, “Vedrinism: France's Global Ambition”, Policy Review , n°103, Oct.-Nov. 2000, pp1-12.
  • CLARKE Michael, “French and British Security: Mirror Images in a Globalized World”, International Affairs , vol.76, n°4, Oct. 2000, pp. 725-740
  • CORDEL Karl (ed.), Poland and the European Union , London, Routledge, 2000.
  • DALGAARD-NIELSEN Anja, “Gulf War: The German Resistance”, Survival , vol.45, n°1, 2003, pp. 99-116.
  • DEIGHTON Anne, “The foreign policy of British Prime Minister Tony Blair: radical or retrograde?”, Centre for British Studies, Humboldt University, Berlin, 11 July 2005, 13p.
  • DRAKE Helen (ed.), French Relations with the European Union , Routledge, 2005.
  • DUNNE Tim, “‘When the shooting starts': Atlanticism in British security strategy”, International Affairs , vol.80, n°5, October 2004, pp. 893-909.
  • GIEGERICH Bastian, PUSHKINA Darya and MOUNT Adam, “Towards a Strategic Partnership? The US and Russian Response to the European Security and Defence Policy”, Security Dialogue , vol.37, n°3, 2006.
  • GOMART Thomas, “Vladimir Poutine ou les avatars de la politique étrangère russe”, Politique étrangère , 2003/3-4, automne-hiver 2003, pp. 789-802.
  • GOMART Thomas, “ France 's Russia Policy : Balancing Interests and Values”, The Washington Quarterly , vol.30, n°2, Spring 2007, pp.147-155.
  • HOWORTH Jolyon, “ France , Britain and the Euro-Atlantic Crisis”, Survival , Vol. 45, No. 4, Winter 2003-2004, pp.173-92.
  • JEANBART Bruno, “Les opinions européennes face au traité constitutionnel”, Politique étrangère , 2005/2, pp.273-284.
  • KAMPFNER John, Blair's Wars , Bath, Free Press, 2003.
  • KARP Regina, “The New German Foreign Policy Consensus”, The Washington Quarterly , vol.29, n°1, Winter 2005-06, pp.61-82.
  • KOENIG-ARCHIBUGI Mathias, “Explaining Government Preferences for Institutional Change in EU Foreign and Security Policy”, International Organization , vol.58, Winter 2004, pp.137-174.
  • MACLOED Alex, “Just defending national interests? Understanding French policy towards Iraq since the end of the Gulf War”, Journal of International Relations and Development  , vol.7, n°4, December 2004, pp. 356-387.
  • McFAUL Michael and Kathryn STONER-WEISS, “The Myth of the Authoritarian Model: How Putin's Crackdown Holds Russia Back”, Foreign Affairs , January/February 2008.
  • MAUER Victor, “ Germany 's Counterterrorism Policy”, in Zimmermann Doron and Andreas Wenger (eds.), How States Fight Terrorism: Policy Dynamics in the West , Boulder/London, Lynne Rienner Publishers, 2007, pp. 59-78.
  • MISKIMMON Alister, “Continuity in the Face of Upheaval—British Strategic Culture and the Impact of the Blair Government”, European Security , vol.13, n°3, 2004, pp. 273-99.
  • OVERHAUS Marco, “In search of a post-hegemonic order: Germany, NATO and the European security and defence policy”, German Politics , vol.13, n°4, December 2004, pp. 551-568.
  • RIEKER Pernille, “From Common Defence to Comprehensive Security: Towards the Europeanization of French Foreign and Security Policy?”, Security Dialogue , vol.37, n°4, 2006.
  • RUDOLF Peter, “The Myth of the ‘ German Way ' : German Foreign Policy and Transatlantic Relations”, Survival , vol.47, n°1, Spring 2005, pp.133-152.
  • SAIVETZ Carol, “Making the Best of a Bad Hand: An Assessment of Current Trends in Russian Foreign Policy”, Post Sovist Affairs , Vol.22, n°2, April-June 2006, pp.166-188.
  • STARK Hans, “ La politique étrangère de l'Allemagne, entre vocation globale et contraintes européennes ” , Politique étrangère , 4/2007.
  • STYAN David, “Jacques Chirac's ' non ': France, Iraq and the United Nations, 1991-2003”, Modern and Contemporary France , vol.12, n°3, August 2004, pp.371-85.
  • TARDY Thierry, “French Threat Perceptions: Between Exceptionalism and Orthodoxy”, in Emil Kirchner and James Sperling (eds.), Vertices of Conflict and Cooperation: Threat Perception into the 21st Century , Routledge, 2006.
  • TRENIN Dmitri, “ Russia Leaves the West”, Foreign Affairs , 85 (4), July/August 2006.
  • YOST David, “ France 's Evolving Nuclear Strategy”, Survival , vol.47, n°3, Autumn 2005, pp.117-146.
  • Dossier spécial de Politique étrangère , “Quelle politique étrangère pour la France ?”, hiver 2002-03. et “Défense : avant le Livre blanc”, in Politique étrangère , 4/2007.

 

 

Séance 11 – Vendredi 16 mai 2008 (16h15-18h)

Relations transatlantiques et perceptions américaines de la sécurité européenne

 

Thèmes d'exposé

1. Commentez la phrase de Robert Kagan selon laquelle les Etats-Unis ‘vivent sur Mars' et les Européens ‘vivent sur Venus'.

2. La relation transatlantique et la crise de l'Irak (2002-2003).

 

Lectures obligatoires

  • KAGAN Robert, “Power and Weakness”, Policy Review , No. 113, June & July 2002.
  • SCHUSTER Jürgen and Herbert MAIER, “The Rift: Explaining Europe's Divergent Iraq Policies in the Run-Up of the American-led War on Iraq ”, Foreign Policy Analysis , July 2006, pp. 223-244.

 

Lectures optionnelles

  • ASMUS Ronald, “Rethinking the EU: Why Washington Needs to Support European Integration”, Survival , vol.47, n°3, Autumn 2005, pp.93-101.
  • ARCHICK Kristin, The United States and Europe: Possible Options for US Policy , Congressional Research Service, Report for Congress, Washington, DC, March 2005, 19 p.
  • BLACKWILL Robert (ed.), The Future of Transatlantic Relations , Task Force Report, Council on Foreign Relations, 1999.
  • CALLEO David, “The Atlantic Alliance in a Global System ”, Asia-Pacific Review , Vol. 14 No . 1, May 2007, pp. 72-89.
  • COONEN Stephen, “ The Widening Military Capabilities Gap between the United States and Europe: Does it Matter? ”, Parameters , Vol. 36, No . 3, Autumn 2006, pp. 67-84.
  • DROZDIAK William, “The North Atlantic Drift”, Foreign Affairs , vol.84, n°1, Jan. 2005, pp.88-98.
  • GORDON Philip and Jeremy SHAPIRO, Allies at War. America, Europe, and the Crisis over Iraq , New York, McGraw-Hill, 2004.
  • JONES Erik, “Debating the transatlantic relationship: rhetoric and reality”, International Affairs, vol.80, n.4, 2004, pp.595-612.
  • KAGAN Robert, “Power and Weakness”, Policy Review , No. 113, June & July 2002.
  • KISSINGER, Henry, SUMMERS, Lawrence and Charles KUPCHAN, “Renewing the Atlantic partnership: report of an independent task force”, The Council on Foreign Relations, 2004.
  • KUPCHAN Charles, The End of the American Era. US Foreign Policy and the Geopolitics of the Twenty-First Century , New York, A. Knopf, 2003.
  • KUPCHAN Charles, “The Fourth Age: The Next Era in Transatlantic Relations”, The National Interest , September/October 2006.
  • LINDSTROM Gustav (ed.), “Shift or Rift. Assessing US-EU Relations after Iraq ”, Chaillot Paper , EUISS, Paris, 2003.
  • MENON Anand, KALYPSO Nicolaidis and Jennifer WELSH, “In Defence of Europe – A Response to Kagan”, Journal of European Affairs  , Vol.2, n°3, August 2004, pp. 5-14.
  • MENON Anand, “From Crisis to Catharsis: ESDP after Iraq ”, International Affairs , Vol. 80, No. 4, July 2004, pp. 631-48.
  • NYE Joseph, The Paradox of American Power. Why the World's only Superpower can't go it alone , Oxford, Oxford University Press, 2002.
  • NYE Joseph, “US Power and Strategy after Iraq”, Foreign Affairs , vol.82, n°4, July/August 2003, pp. 60-73.
  • OSWALD Franz, “Soft Balancing Between Friends: Transforming Transatlantic Relations”, Review of Contemporary German Affairs , Vol. 14, No . 2, August 2006, pp. 145-160.
  • SHAPIRO Jeremy and BYMAN Daniel, “Bridging the Transatlantic Counterterrorism Gap”, The Washington Quarterly , Autumn 2006.
  • SMITH Michael, “Between two Worlds? The European Union, the United States and World Order”, International Politics , vol.41, 2004, pp.95-117.
  • SMITH Michael, “Taming the elephant? The European Union and the management of American power”, Perspectives on European Politics and Society, vol.6, n°1, 2005.
  • TARDY Thierry, “France and the US. The Inevitable Clash ?”, International Journal , vol.LIX, n°1, Winter 2003-04, pp.105-126.
  • VAN OUDENAREN John, “Transatlantic bipolarity and the end of multilateralism”, Political Science Quarterly, vol.120, n.1, 2005, pp.1-32.
  • WALT Stephen, “The Ties that Fray : Why Europe and America are Drifting Apart”, The National Interest , Winter 1998/99.
  • ZABOROWSKI Marcin (ed.), Friends again? EU-US relations after the crisis , EU Institute for Security Studies, Paris, 2006.

 

 

V – Sécurité interne versus sécurité externe

 

Séance 12 – Vendredi 23 mai 2008 (16h15-18h)

La menace terroriste

 

Thèmes d'exposé

1. La réponse de l'Union européenne au 11 Septembre 2001

2. Les organisations de sécurité ont-elles su s'adapter à la menace terroriste ?

 

Lectures obligatoires

  • MONAR Jörg, “Common Threat and Common Response? The European Union's Counter-terrorism strategy and its problems”, Government and Opposition , vol.42, n°3, Summer 2007.
  • GUILD Elspeth, “International Terrorism and EU Immigration, Asylum and Borders Policy: The Unexpected Victims of 11 September 2001”, European Foreign Affairs Review , Vol. 8, No. 3, Fall 2003, pp. 331-46.

 

Lectures optionnelles

  • BERMAN Paul, Terror and Liberalism , New York, Norton and Company, 2003.
  • DEN BOER Monica and MONAR Jörg, “11 September and the Challenge of Global Terrorism to the EU as a Security Actor”, Journal of Common Market Studies , vol. 40, 2002, pp. 11-28.
  • DITTRICH Mirjam, “Facing the global terrorist threat: a European response”, European Policy Centre Working Paper , n°14, January 2005.
  • DUKE Simon, “CESDP and the EU response to 11 September : Identifying the Weakest Link”, European Foreign Affairs Review , vol.7, n°2, Summer 2002, pp.153-169.
  • FREEDMAN Lawrence (ed.), Superterrorism: Policy Responses , Blackwell Publishers, 2002.
  • Heisbourg François (dir.), Hyperterrorisme: la nouvelle guerre , Paris, Odile Jacob, 2001.
  • HOFFMAN Bruce, “Does Our Counter-Terrorism Strategy Match the Threat?”, Testimony presented before the House International Relations Committee, Subcommittee on International Terrorism and Nonproliferation on September 29, 2005.
  • KAPLAN Lawrence, NATO United, NATO Divided. The Evolution of an Alliance , Praeger Publishers, 2004.
  • KEOHANE Daniel, The EU and Counter-Terrorism , Centre for European Reform, London, May 2005.
  • KUPCHAN Charles, “The Waning Days of the Atlantic Alliance”, in Bertel Heurlin and Mikkel Vedby Rasmussen (eds.), Challenges and Capabilities – NATO in the 21st Century , Copenhagen, Danish Institute for International Studies, 2003.
  • MAHNCKE Dieter and Jörg MONAR (eds.), International Terrorism. A European Response to a Global Threat? , College of Europe Studies, n°3, Peter Lang, 2006.
  • MONTAIN-DOMENACH Jacqueline, L'Europe et la sécurité intérieure , Paris, Montchrestien, Clefs politique, 1999, 158 p.
  • NAUMANN Klaus, “9/11 and the Agenda for Prague”, Internationale Politik (Transatlantic edition), vol.3, n°2, Summer 2002, pp. 28-34.
  • REINARES Fernando (ed.), European Democracies Against Terrorism. Governmental Policies and Intergovernmental Cooperation , Ashgate, 2000.
  • SHEA Jamie, “NATO and Terrorism”, Royal United Services Institute Journal , vol.147, n°2, April 2002, pp. 32-40.
  • WILKINSON Paul (ed.), Terrorism Versus Democracy: The Liberal State Response , London , Frank Cass, 2000.
  • WILKINSON Paul, International terrorism : the changing threat and the EU's response , Chaillot Paper n°84, Paris, EU Institute for Security Studies, October 2005, pp. 29-46.

 

 

Séance 13 – Vendredi 30 mai 2008 (16h15-18h)

Repenser la sécurité : Crime organisé et migrations

 

Thèmes d'exposé

1. Crime organisé et souveraineté de l'Etat en Europe

2. Migrations, nouvelles menaces à la sécurité européenne ?

 

Lectures obligatoires

  • BUZAN Barry and Ole WAEVER, “EU-Europe : the European Union and its ‘near abroad'”, pp.352-376, in BUZAN and WAEVER, Regions and Powers. The Structure of International Security , Cambridge, Cambridge University Press, 2003.
  • BRADY Hugo, “The EU and the fight against organized crime”, Working Paper , Centre for European Reform, London , April 2007.

 

Lectures optionnelles

  • BADIE Bertrand et Catherine de WENDEN (dir.), Le défi migratoire , Paris, Presses de Science Po, 1994.
  • BIGO Didier, “When two become one : internal and external securitisations in Europe”, in KELSTRUP Morten, WILLIAMS Michael (eds.), International Relations Theory and the Politics of European Integration. Power Security and Community , London, Routledge, 2000.
  • BIGO Didier, “L'Europe de la sécurité intérieure. Penser autrement la sécurité”, pp.55-90, in LE GLOANNEC Anne-Marie (dir.), Entre Union et Nations. L'Etat en Europe , Paris, Presses de Science Po, 1998.
  • DEN BOER, Monica and WALLACE, William: “Justice and Home Affairs: Integration through Incrementalism?” in Helen WALLACE and William WALLACE (eds.), Policy Making in the European Union , Oxford, Oxford University Press, 2000, pp. 493-518.
  • DIEZ Thomas, STETTER Stephan and ALBERT Mathias, “The European Union and Border Conflicts: The Transformative Power of Integration”, International Organization , vol. 60, Summer 2006.
  • EUROPOL, “2005 EU Organised Crime Report” (Public version), The Hague, 25 October 2005, 33 p.
  • FALLETTI François et Frédéric DEBOVE, Planète criminelle. Le crime, phénomène social du siècle ? , Paris, PUF, 1998.
  • FINDLAY Mark, The Globalisation of Crime. Understanding Transitional Relationships in Context , Cambridge, Cambridge University Press, 1999, 243 p.
  • MILETITCH Nicolas, Trafics et crimes dans les Balkans , Paris, PUF, 1998.
  • PAOLI Letizia and Cyrille FIJNAUT (eds.), Organised Crime in Europe: Concepts, Patterns and Policies in the European Union and Beyond , Dordrecht, Kluwer-Springer, 2004.
  • SABATIER Magali, La coopération policière européenne , Paris, L'Harmattan, 2001, 512 p.
  • SHELLEY Louise, "Transnational Organized Crime: An Imminent Threat to the Nation State?”, Journal of International Affairs , vol.48, n°2, Winter 1995, pp. 463-89.
  • SHELLEY Louise, “ Combating Transnational Crime and Corruption in Europe ”, hearing before the US Senate Committee on Foreign Relations, Subcommittee on European Affairs. Testimony presented on October 30 th , 2003.
  • SIMON Duke and OJANEN Hanna, “Bridging Internal and External Security Lessons from the European Security and Defence Policy”, Journal of European Integration , vol.28, n°5, December 2006.
  • de WENDEN Catherine, L'E urope des migrations , Paris, ADRI / La Documentation française, 2001 (coll. “Le Point sur”).

 

 

Bibliographie générale

 

1. Manuels

  • BADIE Bertrand et Marie-Claude SMOUTS, Le retournement du monde. Sociologie de la scène internationale , Paris, Presses de Science Po, 3è édition, 1999.
  • BATTISTELLA Dario, SMOUTS Marie-Claude et Pascal VENNESSON, Dictionnaire des relations internationales , Paris, Dalloz, 2003.
  • CINI Michelle (ed.), European Union Politics , Oxford University Press, 2003.
  • GEORGE Stephen and Ian BACHE, Politics in the European Union , Oxford University Press, 2001.
  • GOWER Jackie, The European Union Handbook , Chicago, Fitzroy Dearborn Publ., 2002, 460 p.
  • DOUTRIAUX Yves et LEQUESNE Christian, Les institutions de l'Union européenne , Paris, La Documentation française, 5è édition, 2005.
  • DUMOND Jean-Michel et SETTON Philippe, La politique étrangère et de sécurité commune (PESC) , Paris, La Documentation française, 1999.
  • Elgström Ole and Michael Smith (eds.), The European Union's Roles in International Politics: Concepts and Analysis , Routledge, London , 2006.
  • HEYWOOD Paul, Erik JONES, Martin RHODES, and Ulrich SEDELMEIER (eds.), Developments in European Politics , Palgrave Macmillan, 2006.
  • HILL Christopher and Karen SMITH (eds.), European Foreign Policy. Key Documents , Routledge, 2000, 512p.
  • HILL, Christopher and Michael SMITH (eds.), International Relations and the European Union , Oxford University Press, 2005.
  • HIX Simon, The Political System of the European Union , Palgrave, 2005.
  • KNODT Michelle and Sebastian PRINCEN (eds.), Understanding the European Union's External Relations , London, Routledge, 2003.
  • McCORMICK John, Understanding the European Union: a Concise Introduction , 3 rd edition, Palgrave MacMillan, 2005.
  • PETERSON John and Michael SHACKELTON, The Institutions of the European Union , Oxford University Press, 2002.
  • SCHWOK René, Théories de l'intégration européenne , Paris, Montchrestien, coll. Clefs-Politique, 2005, 154p.
  • SMOUTS Marie-Claude, Les organisations internationales , Paris, Armand Colin, 1995, 191 p.
  • Encyclopedia of the European Union , Boulder, Lynne Rienner Publishers, 2000.
  • EuroGuide: Yearbook of the institutions of the European Union and of the other European Organizations , Bruxelles, edition Delta.

 

 

2. Monographies

  • ADLER Emmanuel and Michael BARNETT, Security Communities , Cambridge, Cambridge University Press, 1998, 462 p.
  • BATTISTELLA Dario, Théorie des relations internationales , Paris, Presses de Science Po, 2003.
  • BETTS Richard (ed.), Conflict After the Cold War: Arguments on Causes of War and Peace , 2 nd Edition, New York, Longman, 2002.
  • BISCOP Sven and Andersson Jan Joel (eds.), The EU and the European Security Strategy. Forging a Global Europe , Routledge, 2007.
  • BUFFOTOT Patrice (dir.), La défense en Europe : les adaptations de l'après-guerre froide , Paris, La Documentation française, 1998, 291 p.
  • BUZAN Barry, People, States and Fear : An Agenda for International Security Studies in the Post-Cold War Era , 2 nd edition, Boulder, Lynne Rienner, 1991.
  • BUZAN Barry and Ole WAEVER, Regions and Powers. The Structure of International Security , Cambridge, Cambridge University Press, 2003, 564 p.
  • BRETHERTON Charlotte and John VOGLER, The European Union as a Global Actor , London, Routledge, 1999, 376 p.
  • CALLEO David, Rethinking Europe's Future , Princeton University Press, 2001.
  • CANNIZZARO Enzo (ed.), The European Union as an Actor in International Relations , The Hague, Kluwer Law International, 2002, 345 p.
  • CARLSNAES Walter, SJURSEN Helene and Brian WHITE (eds.), Contemporary European Foreign Policy , London, Sage, 2004.
  • CHECKEL Jeffrey (dir.), International Institutions and Socialization in Europe , Cambridge University Press, 2007.
  • COKER Christopher, “Globalisation and Insecurity in the Twenty-first Century : NATO and the management of Risk”, Adelphi Paper 345 , Oxford University Press, 2002.
  • COOPER Robert, The Breaking of Nations. Order and Chaos in the Twenty-First Century , New York, Grove Press, 2003, 180p.
  • COPPIETERS Bruno, EMERSON Michael, HUYSSEUNE Michel, KOVZIRIDZE Tamara, NOUTCHEVA Gergana, TOCCI Nathalie and Marius VAHL, Europeanization and Conflict Resolution. Case Studies from the European Periphery , Gent, Academia Press, 2004.
  • CORDEL Karl (ed.), Poland and the European Union , London, Routledge, 2000.
  • COTTEY Andrew, Security in the New Europe , Basingstoke , Palgrave-Macmillan, 2007.
  • CROFT Stuart and TERRIF Terry (eds.), Critical Reflections on Security and Change , London, Frank Cass, 2000.
  • DANNREUTHER Roland (ed.), European Union Foreign and Security Policy. Towards a Neighbourhood Strategy , London, Routledge, 2004, 226 p.
  • DEIGHTON Anne (ed.), with MAUER Victor, Securing Europe. Implementing the European Security Strategy , Züricher Beiträge zur Sicherheitspolitik, n°77, October 2006.
  • DEVUYST Youri, The European Union Transformed. Community Method and Institutional Evolution from the Schuman Plan to the Constitution for Europe , Brussels, Peter Lang, 2005, 204p.
  • DRAKE Helen (ed.), French Relations with the European Union , Routledge, 2005.
  • DUKE Simon, The Elusive Quest for European Security : from EDC to CFSP , Palgrave MacMillan, 2000, 426 p.
  • DUMOULIN André, MATHIEU Raphaël et Gordon SARLET, Politique européenne de sécurité et de défense (PESD). De l'opératoire à l'identitaire, Genèse, structuration, ambitions limites , Bruxelles, Bruylant.
  • DUMOULIN André, L'UEO et la politique européenne de défense , Paris, La Documentation française, Problèmes économiques et sociaux, n° 754, 1995, 78 p.
  • DURAND Marie-Françoise et Alvaro de VASCONCELOS (dir.), La PESC : Ouvrir l'Europe au Monde , Paris, Presses de Sciences Po, 1998, 341 p.
  • FABRE Dominique, La politique étrangère et de sécurité commune (PESC) , Paris, La Documentation française, Problèmes politiques et sociaux, n° 775-776, 1996, 126 p.
  • FORSBERG Tuomas and Graeme HERD, Divided West. European Security and the Transatlantic Relationship , Chatham House Papers, Oxford, 2006.
  • Friedrichs Jörg, European Approaches to International Relations Theory. A House with many mansions , Routledge, London, 2004.
  • Gänzle , Stefan and Allen SENS (eds.), The Changing Politics of European Security. Europe Alone? , Palgrave, 2007.
  • GARTON ASH Timothy, Free World. America, Europe, and the Surprising Future of the West , New York, Random House, 2004.
  • GHEBALI, Victor-Yves, L'OSCE dans l'Europe post-communiste, 1990-1996 : vers une identité paneuropéenne de sécurité , Bruxelles, Bruylant, 1996.
  • GINSBERG Roy, The European Union in International Politics : Baptism by Fire , Rowman and Littlefield Publishers, 2001.
  • GNESOTTO Nicole (dir.), EU Security and Defence Policy. The first five years (1999-2004) , Paris, EU Institute for Security Studies, 2004, pp.55-72.
  • GNESOTTO Nicole, La puissance et l'Europe , Paris, Presses de Sciences Po, 1998.
  • GNESOTTO Nicole and Giovanni GREVI (eds.), The New Global Puzzle. What World for the EU in 2025? , EU Institute for Security Studies, Paris, 2006.
  • HAAS Ernst, Beyond the Nation State : Functionalism and International Organization , Stanford, 1964.
  • HANCOCK Donald and David CONRADT et al., Politics in Western Europe , 2 nd edition, Chatham House, 1998.
  • HASSNER Pierre, La Terreur et l'Empire. La Violence et la paix II , Paris, Seuil, 2003.
  • Heisbourg François, La fin de l'Occident: l'Amérique, l'Europe et le Moyen-Orient , Paris, Odile Jacob, 2005.
  • Heisbourg François, L'épaisseur du monde , Paris, Stock, 2007.
  • HENDERSON Karen, European Union's New Democracies , London, Routlege, 2006 (forthcoming).
  • HENDERSON Karen (ed.), The Area of Freedom, Security and Justice in the New Europe , Basingstoke, Plagrave, 2005.
  • HOGAN Michael (ed.), The End of the Cold War. Its Meaning and Implications , New York, Cambridge University Press, 1992.
  • HOLSTI Kalevi, The State, War, and the State of War , Cambridge, Cambridge University Press, 1996.
  • HOWORTH Jolyon and John KEELER (eds.), Defending Europe: The EU, NATO and the Quest for European Autonomy , New York, Palgrave MacMillan, 2003.
  • HOWORTH Jolyon, Security and Defence Policy in the European Union , London & New York, Palgrave, 2007.
  • JONES Seth, The Rise of European Security Cooperation , Cambridge University Press, 2007.
  • KAGAN Robert, Of Paradise and Power. America and Europe in the New World Order , New York, Alfred Knopf, 2003.
  • KASTORYANO Riva (dir.), Quelle identité pour l'Europe? Le multiculturalisme à l'épreuve , Presses de Sciences Po, 2005.
  • KATZENSTEIN Peter (ed.), The Culture of National Security. Norms and Identities of World Politics , New York, Columbia University Press, 1996.
  • KRAUSE Keith and WILLIAMS Michael (eds.), Critical Security Studies , Minneapolis, Borderlines, 1997.
  • LAÏDI Zaki, La norme sans la force. L'énigme de la puissance européenne , Paris, Science Po Les Presses, 2005, 159 p.
  • LAATIKAINEN Katie and Karen SMITH (eds.), The European Union at the United Nations. Intersecting Multilateralisms , Palgrave Macmillan, 2006.
  • LE GLOANNEC Anne-Marie (dir.), Entre Union et Nations. L'Etat en Europe , Paris, Presses de Science Po, 1998, 295 p.
  • LEONARD Mark, Why Europe will run the 21 st Century , Fourth Estate, 2005.
  • LEPGOLD Joseph and Thomas WEISS (ed.), Collective Conflict Management and Changing World Politics , New York, State University of New York Press, 1998.
  • LEQUESNE Christian et Yves SUREL (dir.), L'intégration européenne. Entre émergence institutionnelle et recomposition de l'Etat , Paris, Science Po Les Presses, 2004 291 p.
  • LINDSTROM Gustav, EU-US burdensharing : who does what ? , Chaillot Paper n°82, Paris, EU Institue for Security Studies, September 2005.
  • MAHNCKE Dieter and Jörg MONAR (eds.), International Terrorism. A European Response to a Global Threat? , College of Europe Studies, n°3, Peter Lang, 2006.
  • MANNERS Ian and Richard WHITMAN (eds.), The Foreign Policies of European Union Member States , Manchester, Manchester University Press, 2000, 296 p.
  • MOENS Alexander, COHEN Lenard and Allen SENS, NATO and European Security. Alliance Politics from the End of the Cold War to the Age of Terrorism , Westport, Praeger, 2003.
  • MONTAIN-DOMENACH Jacqueline, L'Europe et la sécurité intérieure , Paris, Montchrestien, Clefs politique, 1999, 158 p.
  • MORAVCSIK Andrew, European Union and World Politics , Routledge, 2006.
  • NUGENT Neill, The Government and Politics of the European Union , 5th edition, Palgrave MacMillan, 2003.
  • NUTTALL Simon, European foreign policy , Oxford, Oxford University Press, 2000, 294 p.
  • NOVOSSELOFF Alexandra et Paul QUILES (dir.), Face au désordre du monde , Paris, Les Portes du monde, 2005, 380 p.
  • PARIS Roland, At War's End. Building Peace After Civil Conflict , Cambridge, Cambridge University Press, 2004.
  • PETERSON John and Mark POLLACK (eds.), Europe, America, Bush: Transatlantic Relations in the 20 th Century , Routledge, 2003.
  • PETITEVILLE Franck, La politique internationale de l'Union européenne , Science Po, Paris, 2006.
  • RIFKIN Jeremy, The European Dream. How Europe's Vision of the Future is Quietly Eclipsing the American Dream , Tarcher Penguin, 2004.
  • SLOAN Stanley, NATO, the European Union, and the Atlantic Community , Lanham, Rowman and Littlefield, 2 nd edition, 2005, 329 p.
  • SMITH Karen, European Union Foreign Policy in a Changing World , Oxford, Polity, 2003, 288 p.
  • SMITH Michael, Europe's Foreign and Security Policy. The Institutionalization of Cooperation , Cambridge, CUP, 2003.
  • SMOUTS Marie-Claude (dir.), Les nouvelles relations internationales. Pratiques et théories , Paris, Presses de Science Po, 1998.
  • SOETENDORP Ben, Foreign Policy in the European Union: Theory, History, and Practice , Longman, 1999, 170 p.
  • TARDY Thierry , La France et la gestion des conflits yougoslaves (1991-1995). Enjeux et leçons d'une opération de maintien de la paix de l'ONU , Bruylant, Bruxelles, 1999.
  • TARDY Thierry (ed.), Peace Operations after 11 September 2001 , London , Frank Cass, 2004.
  • TERPAN Fabien, La politique étrangère et de sécurité commune de l'Union européenne , Bruxelles, Bruylant, 2003, 540 p.
  • TONRA Ben and Thomas CHRISTIANSEN (eds.), Rethinking European Union Foreign Policy , Manchester University Press, 2005.
  • WALLACE William, WALLACE Helen and Mark POLLACK (eds.), Policy-Making in the European Union , Oxford University Press, fifth edition, 2005, 688 p.
  • WALTERS William and Jens HAAHR, Governing Europe : Discourse, Governmentality and European Integration , London, Routledge, 2005.
  • YOST David, NATO Transformed. The Alliance's New Roles in International Security , Washington, DC, United State Institute of Peace Press, 1998.
  • ZIELONKA Jan and Alex PRAVDA (eds.), Democratic Consolidation in Eastern Europe, vol. 2 (International and Transnational Factors), Oxford University Press, 2001.
  • ZORGBIBE Charles, Histoire de l'Union européenne , collection Robert Schuman, Paris, Albin Michel, 2005.

 

 

3. Articles

  • BAYLIS John, “European Security in the Post-Cold War Era: The Continuing Struggle between Realism and Utopianism”, European Security , vol. 7, n° 3, Autumn 1998, pp. 14-27.
  • COLLARD-WEXLER Simon, “Integration under Anarchy: Neorealism and the European Union”, European Journal of International Relations , vol.12, n°3, 2006.
  • COOPER Robert: "How Shall We Answer Robert Kagan?", Internationale Politik (Transatlantic Edition), V ol. 4, No. 2 (Summer 2003): pp. 19-24.
  • CROFT Stuart, “The EU, NATO and Europeanisation: The Return of Architectural Debate”, European Security , vol. 19, n° 3, Autumn 2000, pp. 1-20.
  • DEIGHTON Anne: “The European Security and Defence Policy” in JHH Weiler, Iain Begg and John Peterson (eds.), Integration in an Expanding European Union: Reassessing the Fundamentals , Oxford, Blackwell, 2003, pp. 275-293.
  • EVERTS Steven and KEOHANE Daniel, “The European Convention and EU foreign policy: Learning From Failure”, Survival , Vol. 45, No. 3 (Autumn 2003): pp. 167-186.
  • FUKUYAMA Francis, “The End of History and the Last Man”, National Interest , 1989.
  • GIEGERICH Bastian and William WALLACE, “Not such a Soft Power : the External Deployment of European Forces”, Survival , vol.46, n°2, 2004, pp.163-182.
  • GUEROT Ulrike, “Europe could become the first ‘post-modern' superpower”, European Affairs, fall 2004.
  • HAINE Jean-Yves, “Idealism and power: the new EU security strategy”, Current History, March 2004, pp.107-112.
  • HOWORTH Jolyon, “France, Britain and the Euro-Atlantic Crisis”, Survival , Vol. 45, No. 4, Winter 2003-2004.
  • HYDE-PRICE Adrian, “European Security, Strategic Culture, and the Use of Force”, European Security , vol.13, n°4, 2004, pp.323-343.
  • HILL Christopher, “Renationalizing or regrouping? EU foreign policy since September 2001”, Journal of Common Market Studies, vol.42, n.1, 2004, pp.143-163.
  • HOLSLAG Jonathan, “The European Union and China: The Great Disillusion”, European Foreign Affairs Review , vol.11, 2006.
  • IRONDELLE Bastien et Pascal VENNESSON (dir.), “ L'Europe de la défense : Institutionnalisation, européanisation” , numéro spécial de la revue Politique européenne , n° 8, automne 2002, pp. 5-130.
  • KAGAN Robert, “Power and Weakness”, Policy Review , No. 113, June & July 2002.
  • KARLAS Jan, “The ESDP-building process and conflict prevention: intergovernmental policy-making and institutional expertise”, Journal of International Relations and Development , vol.8, n°2, June 2005, pp.164-191.
  • KAY Sean, “What Went Wrong with NATO?”, Cambridge Review of International Affairs , vol.18, n°1, April 2005, pp.69-83.
  • KAY Sean, “NATO, the Kosovo War, and Neoliberal Theory”, Contemporary Security Policy , vol.25, n°2, pp.252-279.
  • KEOHANE Daniel, “Unblocking NATO-EU Co-operation”, CER Bulletin , Issue 48, June/July 2006.
  • KING Anthony, “The Future of the European Security and Defence Policy”, Contemporary Security Policy , vol.26, n°1, April 2005, pp.44-61.
  • LAKE David, “Beyond Anarchy. The Importance of Security Institutions”, International Security , vol.26, n°1, Summer 2001.
  • LAVENEX Sandra, “EU external governance in ‘wider Europe'”, Journal of European Public Policy , vol.11, n°4, August 2004, pp.680-700.
  • MACE Catriona, “Operation Concordia : developing a 'European' approach to crisis management?”, International Peacekeeping , vol.11, n°3, Autumn 2004, pp. 474-490.
  • MAJOR Claudia, “Europeanisation and Foreign and Security Policy – Undermining or Rescuing the Nation State?”, Politics , vol.25., n°3, September 2005, pp.175-190.
  • MANNERS Ian, “Normative Power Europe Reconsidered: Beyond the Crossroads”, Journal of European Public Policy , vol.13, n°2, March 2006.
  • McCALLA Robert, “NATO's Persistence after the Cold War”, International Organization , vol.50, n°3, Summer 1996, pp.445-475.
  • MEYER, Christoph, The Quest for a European Strategic Culture. Changing Norms on Security and Defence in the European Union , London : Palgrave Macmillan, 2006.
  • MORAVCSIK Andrew, “A Too Perfect Union? Why Europe Said ‘No'”, Current History , November 2005, pp.355-359.
  • NAERT Frederik, “European Security and Defence in the EU Constitutional Treaty”, Journal of Conflict and Security Law , vol.10, n°2, 2005, pp.187-207.
  • OGUZLU Tarik, “An Analysis of Turkey's Prospective Membership in the European Union from a ‘Security' Perspective”, Security Dialogue , vol.34, n°3, September 2003, pp.285-299.
  • POSEN Barry, “ESDP and the Structure of World Power”, The International Spectator , vol.XXXIX, n°1, 2004.
  • POSEN Barry, “European Union Security and Defence Policy: Response to Unipolarity?”, Security Studies , vol.15, n°2, April-June 2006.
  • REICHARD Martin, “Some Legal Issues Concerning the EU-NATO Berlin Plus Agreement”, Nordic Journal of International Law , vol.73, n°1, 2004, pp. 37-67.
  • RÜHLE Michael, “The Evolution of NATO: Expanding the Transatlantic Toolkit”, American Foreign Policy Interests , Vol. 29, n°4, 2007, pp. 237-242.
  • RYNNING Sten, “The European Union: Towards a Strategic Culture?”, Security Dialogue , vol.34, n°4, December 2003.
  • SALMON Trevor, “‘United in its diversity' (or Disunited in Adversary): That is the question for the EU and the European Security and Defence Policy”, Perspectives on European Politics and Society , vol.5, n°3, 2004, pp.447-468.
  • SETH Jones, “The Rise of European Defence”, Political Science Quarterly , vol.121, n°2, Summer 2006.
  • SMITH Michael, “Toward a theory of EU foreign policy-making: multi-level governance, domestic politics, and national adaptation to Europe's common foreign and security policy”, Journal of European Public Policy , vol.11, n°4, August 2004, pp.740-758.
  • TARDY Thierry , “ EU-UN Cooperation in Peacekeeping. A Promising Relationship in a Constrained Environment ”, in Martin Ortega (dir.), The EU and the UN: Partners in Effective Multilateralism , Cahiers de Chaillot, n°78, Institut d'Etudes de Sécurité de l'Union européenne, Paris, juin 2005.
  • TARDY Thierry , “‘Prevention' versus ‘Pre-emption': Where does the EU Stand?”, in Giovanna Bono (ed.), European foreign and security policy after September 2001 and the ‘new war on terror': reconstructing global order? , Brussels , Politeia and VUB Press, 2006, p.127-150 .
  • TERRIFF Terry, “Fear and loathing in NATO: the Atlantic alliance after the crisis over Iraq”, Perspectives on European Politics and Society , vol.5, n°3, 2004.
  • TONRA Ben, “Constructing the CFSP: The Utility of a Cognitive Approach”, Journal of Common Market Studies , vol.41, n°4, September 2001.
  • VALASEK Tomas, “New EU Members in Europe's Security Policy”, Cambridge Review of International Affairs , vol.18, n°2, July 2005, pp. 217-228.
  • WAEVER Ole, “The EU as a security actor: reflections from a pessimistic constructivist on post-sovereign security orders” in M. Kelstrup and M. Williams (eds.), International Relations theory and the politics of European integration , New York, Routledge, 2000.
  • WAGNER Wolfgang, “Why the EU's Common foreign and security policy will remain intergovernmental: a rationalist institutional choice analysis of European crisis management policy”, Journal of European Public Policy , vol.10, n°4, August 2003, pp.576-595.
  • WALTZ Kenneth, “The Emerging Structure of International Politics”, International Security , vol.14, n°4, Spring 1990.
  • WEBBER Mark et. al., “The governance of European security”, Review of International Studies, n°30, 2004, pp.3-26.
  • WHITMAN Richard, “NATO, the EU and ESDP: an emerging division of labour?”, Contemporary Security Policy, vol.25, n.3, December 2004, pp.430-451.
  • WIVEL Anders, “The Security Challenge of Small EU Member States : Interests, Identity and the Development of the EU as a Security Actor”, Journal of Common Market Studies , vol.43, n°2, June 2005, pp. 393-412.
  • WOHLFORTH William, “The Stability of a Unipolar World”, International Security, vol.24, n°1, Summer 1999, pp. 3-41 .

 

 

 

4. Rapports de think tanks , instituts de recherche et organisations internationales

  • AGNIESZKA Nowak (ed.), “Civilian crisis management : the EU way”, Chaillot Paper 90, Institut d'Etudes de sécurité de l'Union européenne, Paris, juin 2006.
  • ARCHICK Kristin, The United States and Europe: Possible Options for US Policy , Congressional Research Service, Report for Congress, Washington, DC, March 2005.
  • ARCHICK Kristin and Paul GALLIS, NATO and the European Union , CRS Report for Congress, Jan. 2006.
  • ASMUS, Ronald and Richard HOLBROOKE, “Re-Inventing NATO”, Riga Papers , The German Marshall Fund of the United States, November 2006, pp. 1-16.
  • BISCOP Sven, “NATO, ESDP and the Riga Summit : No Transformation without Re-Equilibration”, Royal Institute for International Relations (IRRI-KIIB), Egmont Paper 11 , 2006, 25 p.
  • BISCOP, Sven, “The ABC of European Union Strategy: Ambition, Benchmark, Culture”, Egmont Paper 16 , Brussels , October 2007.
  • BLACKWILL Robert (ed.), The Future of Transatlantic Relations , Task Force Report, Council on Foreign Relations, 1999.
  • BERTEL Heurlin and Mikkel VEDBY RASMUSSEN (eds.), Challenges and Capabilities – NATO in the 21 st Century , Copenhagen, Danish Institute for International Studies, 2003.
  • BRADY Hugo, “The EU and the fight against organized crime”, Working Paper, Centre for European Reform, London , April 2007.
  • BRIMMER Esther and Stefan FROHLICH (eds.), The Strategic Implications of EU Enlargement , Washington, DC, Center for Transatlantic Relations, 2005.
  • CAMERON Fraser and QUILLE Gerrard, ESDP: The State of Play , European Policy Centre, Working Paper n°11, Brussels, September 2004.
  • CAMERON Fraser, “The European Neighbourhood Policy as a Conflict Prevention Tool”, European Policy Center, EPC Issue Paper n°47 , June 2006, 29 p.
  • CORNISCH Paul, EU and NATO: Co-operation or Competition? , Directorate-General for External Policies of the Union, European Parliament, 14 October 2006.
  • DITTRICH Mirjam, Facing the global terrorist threat: a European response , European Policy Centre Working Paper n°14, Brussels, January 2005.
  • EL-HOKAYEM Emile, How the United States and Europe can (and do) cooperate in the Middle East , Washington, DC, The Henry L. Stimson Center, November 14, 2004.
  • EVERTS Steven et alii, A European Way of War , Centre for European Reform, London , 2004.
  • FORSYTHE David, The US and Trans-Atlantic relations: on the difference between dominance and hegemony , Copenhagen, Danish Institute for International Studies Working Paper n°16, 2005.
  • FLOURNOY Michèle and Julianne SMITH (eds.), European Defense Integration. Bridging the Gap Between Strategy and Capabilities , Washington, DC, CSIS, October 2005.
  • GRANT Charles, “Preparing for the the multipolar world : European foreign and security policy in 2020”, Centre for European Reform, London , December 2007.
  • JONES Seth, The rise of Europe's defense industry , The Brookings Institution, US-Europe Analysis Series , Washington, DC, May 2005.
  • KISSINGER Henry, SUMMERS Lawrence and Charles KUPCHAN, Renewing the Atlantic partnership: report of an independent task force , Council on Foreign Relations, 2004.
  • KEOHANE Daniel, “Unblocking NATO-EU Co-operation”, CER Bulletin , Issue 48, June/July 2006.
  • LINDLEY-FRENCH Julian and Franco ALGIERI, A European Defence Strategy , Gütersloh, Bertelsmann Foundation, May 2004.
  • MØLLER Bjørn, The EU as a Security Actor. ‘Security by Being' and ‘Security by Doing' , Danish Institute for International Studies, 2005:12.
  • ORTEGA Martin, “Building the Future. The EU's contribution to global governance”, Chaillot Paper 100 , EU Institute for Security Studies, 2007.
  • PAPACOSMA Victor et al. (eds.), EU enlargement and new security challenges in the Eastern Mediterranean , Joint publication of the Research and Development Center-Intercollege and the Lyman L. Lemnitzer Center for NATO and EU Studies, Kent State University, 2004.
  • PILEGAARD Jess (ed.), The Politics of European Security , Danish Institute for International Studies, Copenhagen, 2004.
  • SZAYNA Thomas, NATO Enlargement, 2000-2015. Determinants and Implications for Defence Planning and Shaping , RAND, 2006.
  • TARDY Thierry and Erik WINDMAR, The EU and Peace Operations, Proceedings of a Workshop held at the Geneva Centre for Security Policy, 22-23 September 2003.
  • TARDY Thierry, “Limits and Opportunities of UN-EU Relations in Peace Operations: Implications for DPKO”, External Study, Peacekeeping Best Practices Unit, Department for Peacekeeping Operations, United Nations, New York, September 2003.
  • ZABOROWSKI Marcin (ed.), “Facing China's Rise: Guidelines for an EU Strategy”, Chaillot Paper n°94 , EU Institute for Security Studies, Paris, December 2006.
  • “European Defence. A Proposal for a White Paper”, Report of an independent Task Force (Paris: Institute for Security Studies, May 2004).
  • Human Security Centre, “ Human Security Report, 2005. War and Peace in the 21 st Century”, The University of British Columbia, Canada, 2005.

 

 

5. Documents de référence

Union européenne

  • Traité instituant la Communauté européenne du charbon et de l'acier (1951)
    http://europa.eu.int/eur-lex/lex/fr/treaties/dat/11951K/tif/11951K.html
  • Traité instituant la Communauté économique européenne (1957)
    http://europa.eu.int/eur-lex/lex/fr/treaties/dat/11957E/tif/11957E.html
  • Traité instituant la Communauté européenne de l'énergie atomique (1957)
    http://europa.eu.int/eur-lex/lex/fr/treaties/dat/11957K/tif/11957K.html
  • Traité de l'Union européenne (1992), Journal officiel n° C 191 du 29 juillet 1992
    http://europa.eu.int/eur-lex/lex/fr/treaties/dat/11992M/htm/11992M.html
  • (version consolidée : Journal officiel n° C 325 du 24 décembre 2002)
    http://europa.eu.int/eur-lex/lex/fr/treaties/dat/11997M/htm/11997M.html#0145010077
  • Traité de Nice, Journal officiel n° C 80 du 10 mars 2001
    http://europa.eu.int/eur-lex/lex/fr/treaties/dat/12001C/pdf/12001C_FR.pdf
  • Traité établissant une Constitution pour l'Europe, Journal officiel n° C 310 du 16 décembre 2004
    http://europa.eu.int/eur-lex/lex/JOHtml.do?uri=OJ:C:2004:310:SOM:FR:HTML
  • Treaty of Lisbon amending the Treaty on European Union and the Treaty establishing the European Community, signed at Lisbon , 13 December 2007 , Journal official C 306 du 17 décembre 2007.
  • “De Tampere à Séville : Bilan de la sécurité européenne. Tome 1”, Cultures et conflits , n° 45, printemps 2002.
  • “De Tampere à Séville : Bilan de la sécurité européenne. Tome 2”, Cultures et conflits , n° 46, été 2002.
  • “De Laeken à Copenhague. Les textes fondamentaux de la défense européenne”, documents réunis par Jean-Yves Haine , Institut d'Etudes de sécurité de l'Union européenne, Cahier de Chaillot 57 , volume III, Paris, février 2003.
  • “De Copenhague à Bruxelles. Les textes fondamentaux de la défense européenne”, documents réunis par Antonio Missiroli, Institut d'Etudes de sécurité de l'Union européenne, Cahier de Chaillot 67 , volume IV, Paris, décembre 2003.
  • “Sécurité et défense de l'UE. Textes fondamentaux 2004”, Institut d'Etudes de sécurité de l'Union européenne, Cahier de Chaillot 75 , volume V, Paris, février 2005.
  • “De Nice à Laeken. Les textes fondamentaux de la défense européenne”, documents réunis par Maartje Rutten, Institut d'Etudes de sécurité de l'Union européenne, Cahier de Chaillot 51 , volume II, Paris, avril 2002.
  • The Barcelona Report of the Study Group on Europe's Security Capabilities. “A Human Security Doctrine for Europe”, Barcelona, 15 September 2004, 35 pages.
  • “Une Europe sûre dans un monde meilleur”, Stratégie Européenne de sécurité , Bruxelles, 12 décembre 2003, 16 pages.
  • “Communication de la Commission sur la prévention des conflits”, Commission européenne, Bruxelles, 2001.
  • “L'Union européenne et l'Afrique : Vers un partenariat stratégique”, Conseil européen, Bruxelles, 19 décembre 2005.

 

OTAN

NATO Handbook.

 

 

6. Quelques sites internet

 

 

Additional information and readings of the course are available upon login at the bottom of this page.